On the 12th April 2020, applicant in his capacity as a Designated Agent, filed an application for condonation in this Court. 1st Respondent (employer) opposed the application. 2nd Respondent (employee) supported the application. The background is stated herewith. Applicant is a Designated Agent for the NEC for Welfare & Educational Institutions. In that capacity he dealt with a dispute between the employer and the employee. On the 3rd October 2018 he made a ruling. He ordered the employer to reinstate the employee or pay him damages in lieu of reinstatement. More
I dismissed the appeal on the day of hearing and indicated that reasons would follows. These are they:
This is an appeal against the findings of the Appeals hearing dismissing Appellant from employment after confirming his guilty for contravening offence D14 OF Art Corporation Code of Conduct, that is to say, any act conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfillment of the express or implied conditions of one’s contract of employment; and contravening offence D9 of Art Corporation Code of Conduct, that is to say, willful loss or damage of company property. More
On 26 September 2012 the Honourable R.E. Nhiwatiwa made an arbitration award at Harare. In terms of thereof he dismissed appellant’s claim of unfair dismissal by respondent. Appellant then appealed to this Court against the award. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
The arbitrator W Musiiwa issued an arbitration award on 24 September 2012. In terms thereof he dismissed the appellants’ claim of unfair dismissal from employment by the respondent. The appellants then appealed to this Court against the award. The respondent opposed the appeal.
The Grounds of Appeal averred are as follows:
“The 1stand 2ndapplicants were employed on silent contracts as indicated on the last form they completed dated 1 July. They had been on fixed term contracts previously but on this one their contractual agreement was very silent. The CBA of the Catering Industry S I 167/91 in section 17... More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Respondent’s Disciplinary Committee, which found the Appellant guilty of misconduct and dismissed him from employment. More
