The appellant employed the respondent as an expenditure clerk from July 2000. She was engaged as a grade 7 employee. In February 2018 the appellant was assigned to do grade 9 duties. Her pay and other benefits remained at those of a grade 7 employee. As a result, the respondent made a claim against the appellant raising the issue of the failure by the appellant to pay her an acting allowance. More
The appellant employed the respondent as an expenditure clerk from July 2000. She was a grade seven employee in February 2018, the appellant was assigned to do grade nine duties. Her pay and other benefits however remained at those of a grade 7 employee.
The respondent brought a claim against the appellant alleging that the appellant had failed and or neglected to pay her an acting allowance. The issue referred to the arbitrator was therefore that of alleged nonpayment of an acting allowance. More
The present matter is an appeal against the determination and penalty imposed by the 1st Respondent Disciplinary Authority which determination was dated 6 May 2015. More
On 7th March 2013 the Honourable M. Dangarembizi made an arbitration award. In terms thereof he ordered Appellant to pay 2nd Respondent an amount of $14,706.04 in respect of union dues collected from 1st Respondent. Appellant then appealed to this Court against the award. More
At the onset of oral argument in this Court, respondents made an oral application for condonation of the late filing of their Response. Appellant opposed the application.
It is common cause that the notice of appeal was served on respondents on 22nd June 2023. They were required to file a Response on or by 6th July 2023. They only filed their Response on 13th July 2023. They were 5 days out of time. Respondents’ attorney stated, from the bar, that they had problems in uploading the Response onto the Court’s IECMS platform over the 5 days. They also tried using... More
