This is an appeal against the decision of the National Hearing Committee (“N.H.C”) which set aside the dismissal penalty which had been meted out on the respondent by the Regional Hearing Committee (“R.H.C”). More
The appellant employed the respondent as a technical adviser.
The appellant charged the respondent with acts of misconduct, found him guilty and dismissed him.
The respondent appealed to the National hearing committee which reversed the decision to find him guilty and to dismiss him.
The appellant was aggrieved and it noted this appeal to this court.
The facts which lead to the dispute between the parties are that the appellant instructed the respondent through its client Services Chinhoyi on 10 September 2014 to put his home phone on incoming services only because it had accumulated a lot of arrears due... More
The Respondent was employed by the appellant. He was nominated to go and attend a presentation or workshop. On his way to the workshop his motor vehicle broke down. He failed to communicate his predicament to his employers because he did not have a mobile cell phone. He was rescued at about 1800 hours. More
