This is an appeal against both conviction and penalty. The appellant was charged in terms of section 4 paragraph (a) of the model code of conduct Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006 which reads;
“4(a) any act of conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfillment of the express or implied condition of his/her contract”. More
In this appeal the respondent raised a point in limine to the effect that ground of appeal No 1 was not a ground of appeal but one of review. The grounds read-
1. The Hearing Authority erred procedurally in inviting the parties to file closing submissions immediately after the closure of the Complainant’s case without putting the Appellant to his defence and allowing him to be cross- examined.
2. The Hearing Authority erred at law in retaining a verdict of guilty in the absence of evidence on a balance of probabilities to that effect seeing as:
2.1 There were clear... More
This is an application for quantification of damages due to the applicant employee following her successful appeal against dismissal from employment where she was rendering cashier services to the respondent employer.
Respondent concedes the claim in part but puts the applicant to the proof of the remainder. In particular respondent says it is prepared to pay appellant 24months’ salary from 26 October 2009 to 18 October 2021 sum totalling $9120 at $380 per month. More
This is an appeal against Honourable Mr Z. Mtimtema’s arbitral award, handed down on 15th April 2014. The award upheld the dismissal of the Appellant from employment after the Respondent’s Disciplinary Committee found him guilty of misconduct. More
The Applicant was employed by the Respondent as a driver until June 2016 when he was dismissed from employment. This was following a disciplinary process convened in terms of Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006. The Applicant was facing charges arising from allegations that he had pre-warned illegal fuel dealers of the impending spot-checks or inspections by the Respondent’s officials thus by doing he was frustrating his employer’s regulatory role. The Applicant was found guilty of the charges. His initial appeal to the Respondent’s Appeals Officer was dismissed for lack of merit on 18 July 2016. More
