At the onset of this appeal the appellant employee sought to amend his relief which he felt he had worked badly. He also sought to have the court impugn what he
styled the belatedly filed Heads of Argument by the respondent employer. It is only these two issues which are addressed by this judgment. More
This is an appeal from the decision made by the respondent’s Disciplinary Authority.
[2]The respondent dismissed the appellant from employment following disciplinary proceedings for : “Abuse, that is sexual harassment of any employee or other person at the workplace or during the course of business , for example making unwanted sexual advances, inappropriate and unwanted gestures or suggestions or hints of a sexual natur More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award.
The respondent was employed by the appellant as a till operator from 20 August 2010 to 30 June 2013. He claimed he was unfairly dismissed when he was put on leave without pay and returned to find that the respondent had closed the place of business he was operating from. More
1. This is an appeal against the decision of the judgment of the Appeal Committee at the workplace. The appellant was charged of 4 and convicted of 2 charges of acts of misconduct in terms of the employment code. A penalty of dismissal was imposed. The appeal is against both conviction and penalty. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The test for such application is settled. See Masekesa v Kingdom Financial Holdings SC 18-12 AND Dombodzvuku v CMED SC-31-12.
The background to the matter at hand is that the Labour Court on 14 February 2014 dismissed the applicant’s appeal in a matter which pitted him and the respondent employer. Irked by the dismissal of his appeal the applicant now wants to appeal to the Supreme Court against that 2014 decision. As is trite law it is incumbent upon such an appellant to first seek leave of appeal... More
