Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an appeal from the decision of the National Hearing Committee which committee overturned the conviction and penalty of the Disciplinary Committee. The appellant charged the respondent of an act of misconduct in terms of the company code of conduct. The respondent was charged of committing category 4.1 offence in that he had repeated a category 3.1 offence when he was still serving a penalty for the category 3.1 offence. Category 4.1 offence is Gross Misconduct. The charge arose from failure to communicate to a client on the complaints raised by the client and failure to attend to the... More

Respondent was charged with four acts of misconduct arising out of an act of unlawful re-connecting telephone lines of clients whom Appellant had disconnected for defaulting in their payments for services rendered. More

This is an application for rescission of a default judgment entered against the applicant employee in a labour dispute pitting it and the respondent employer. More

________________________________________________________________ On 19 May 2014 this Court handed down an order against the employees where the employer had applied to the Court in termsof Rule 19 (3) (a), to have the review application which it had filed with the court to be granted in default of the employees’ filing of heads of argument timeously as required by the rules. The employees through their lawyers have requested this court to furnish them with the full reasons for that order and these are they More

The Respondent was employed by the Appellant as a Regional Site Acquisition Supervisor. The record shows that the Respondent was head hunted by the Appellant through the internet. Prior to joining Appellant he was employed in Uganda. He relocated to Zimbabwe when he got employment with the Appellant. The Respondent’s contract of employment commenced on 10th of December 2009. Less than four months into the job the Respondent was dismissed from employment by the Appellant. The matter was referred to the Labour Officer and consequently to an Arbitrator. The Arbitrator handed down the first award in favour of the Respondent. More