This is an appeal against the decision of the appeals officer in a labour dispute pitting appellant employee and the respondent employer.
Facts of the matter are that the appellant who was in the respondent’s employ as a driver trainer was brought before a disciplinary committee to answer to charges of gross incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of his work. It was stated that the appellant had not been retested and that militated against him partaking duties that could require him to go to South Africa. Following the disciplinary hearing, he was dismissed from employment. He appealed internally without... More
In its response to the appeal, Respondent raised a point in limine to the effect that since the NEC Appeals Board (Appeal Board) is comprised of two representatives or their alternates from each of the Parties vis the ZIMBABWE BANK & ALLIED WORKERS UNION (ZIBAWU) and the BANKERS EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION OF ZIMBABWE (BEAZ), ZIBAWU can not appeal against its own decision. More
This is an application for review of a decision made by the respondent.
The applicant was employed as a truck driver. During the course of his duties it was alleged he committed some act of misconduct sometime in August 2015. He was charged in terms of the applicable Code of Conduct. He was found liable and dismissed with effect from 14 October 2015. An internal appeal was unsuccessful. More
The matter was placed before me as an application for leave to appeal against a determination handed down by this Court on 31January 2014.
The appellant is a former employee of the respondent. He was charged with two acts of misconduct viz any act and/or omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conducting of his career or employment (Section 4 (a) of Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006, and or
- Gross incompetence or inefficiency in the performance of his work.
He was found guilty on the charge. A penalty of dismissal was consequently imposed. The appellant brought... More
The appeal was noted against the decision of the Respondent’s Hearing Officer handed down on 10 February 2011 which decision resulted inthe Appellant’sdismissal from employment with effect from the same date. More
