On 18th February 2011 the NEC Banking made a determination. In terms thereof Appellant was ordered to reinstate Respondent’s employment without loss of salary and benefits. Appellant then appealed to this Court against the determination. More
On 30th March 2010 the NEC Banking made a determination. It ordered Appellant to reinstate Respondent’s employment without loss of salary and benefits from the date of her dismissal. Appellant then appealed to this Court against the determination. Respondent opposed the appeal.
Appellant’s case was as follows:
1. Respondent worked for Appellant as an Acting Transaction Controller.
2. On 4th January 2006 she raised a payment voucher for
ZWD$2 650.000.
3. She encashed the voucher and paid one Chareka for services rendered to Appellant.
4. On or about the same date it was found that the payment voucher was not... More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Such an application is governed by section 92 F of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] as well as Rule 36 of this Court’s rules, S.I. 59/2006. More
This is an appeal against the Arbitrator’s findings that;
1) The Respondents were unfairly and unlawfully dismissed by the Appellant from employment.
2) The Respondents be reinstated and paid their backpay up to date of dismissal.
3) Reinstatement would not be a viable option considering the level of disagreement that exists between the parties.
4) (i) That Rolland S.H Corbett be paid a total of $133 800.00 being damages in lieu of reinstatement.
(ii) That Jason J. Corbett be paid a total sum of $80 640.00 being damages in lieu of reinstatement
(iii) That Heath C. Corbett be paid a... More
