This is an application for leave to appeal a decision of this court to the Supreme Court. The decision being sought to be appealed against was handed down on 26 July 2019.
When the application for leave to appeal was heard in court, the 2nd respondent raised 3 points in limine. The 2nd respondent argued that the application was fatally defective due to its failure to comply with the law and practice and must be struck off the Roll. More
This matter was determined on the basis of the record as agreed to by the parties’ respective legal practitioners.
This is an application for condonation of late noting of appeal. In order for an application of this nature to succeed, the following considerations must be made.
(a) Whether the extent of the delay was inordinate regard being had to the circumstances of the case
(b) Whether a reasonable explanation for the delay was proffered
(c) Whether there are prospects of success should the matter be heard on the merits. More
The respondent was charged with misconduct in terms of what is styled, in the Charge Sheet, as the Marathon Group of Companies Code of Conduct. He is alleged to have contravened section 12 thereof, receiving or attempting to receive a bribe. More
This is an application for condonation for the late filing of an application for review. When the matter was first heard on 7 May 2024 both respondents were in default. The Court sought to seek clarifications from the 2nd respondent and invited him to Court. During the 2nd hearing on 3 July 2023, the 2nd respondent appeared in person. More
