Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
A hearing was conducted by the applicants’ disciplinary committee which found the 1st respondent not guilty. The applicant appealed to 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent heard the appeal and came up with a determination that is the subject of this application for review. More

This is an appeal against the arbitral award that was granted in favour of the Respondent by Honourable Arbitrator Kazembe on the 5th of July 2018. In the award the Respondent was granted damages in lieu of reinstatement amounting to $418 060-00. More

This is an appeal against the Arbitral Award that was handed down by Honourable Arbitrator A.J. Manase on 1st February 2013. In this award the Arbitrator ordered that Appellant should pay its employees a housing allowance calculated at 50% of the basic pay. The total figure of the housing allowance was $12 894 294 291,92. More

Respondents were employed by the appellant in various capacities. Following an audit at appellant’s work place, it was discovered that a lot of property was missing. This led to the arrest of the three respondents and several other employees at the appellant’s work place. Disciplinary proceedings were brought against the three respondents and they were found guilty and a recommendation for their dismissal was made. Respondents appealed to the Appeals Officer who confirmed the decision of the Disciplinary Committee. The respondents took the matter to the labour officer and the matter was referred to arbitration. The arbitrator found in favour... More

This matter has been outstanding for a long time.One of the reasons for delay in finilazing it was interlocutory matters. In order to bring finality, thisCourt (Muzofa J) on14 May 2013 made the following order: “1. The appeal be and is hereby upheld. 2. The matter be and is hereby referred to the Provincial Labour Officer for him/her within ten days of this order to appoint a different arbitrator to hear the matter on the merits.” The above order meant to obviate any further interlocutory applications either before the arbitrator or before the court. More