This is an application in terms of Section 93 (7) (b) (ii) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01], wherein applicant’s claim is for payment of outstanding wages and benefits in terms of the contract the parties entered into. More
This is an appeal against the arbitrator’s decision where she dismissed the now appellants’ claim for gratuity in circumstances where they had accepted a pension less favourable than gratuity. Facts of the matter are that the appellant employees who worked for Mukundi plastics and Bevpak later as a going concern got to their respective retirement ages. At that stage they each received their dues upon retirement including receipt of a pension from the pension fund to which they contributed until 2008. More
This is an application for interim relief by the Applicant (“employer”) against the Respondent (“employee”) pending the hearing and conclusion of an appeal concerning the above quoted parties. More
Appellant was in Respondent’s employ as an Engineer. In terms of Section 29.4 and 29.18 of Respondent’s Code of Conduct (THE CODE) Appellant was charged with neglect of duty/responsibility and damage to company property. He was found guilty of both and was issued with a final written warning for the first charge and a dismissal for the second one. More
