The 1st to the 56th Respondents who are applicant employees brought a claim for alleged non-payment of outstanding salaries and the dispute was referred for adjudication in terms of section 63 of the Labour Act [chapter 28:01] (the Act). The designated agent made a determination on 20 November 2023. The applicant was dissatisfied with the determination and filed this application for review alleging procedural unfairness and bias. More
This is an application for condonation of late filing of an appeal.
The applicant is a former employee of the respondent. He was employed as a parking marshal at the relevant time when he incurred a $2.00 shortfall on the 6th of October 2014 in remitting his collections for the day. More
The appellant submitted that the Appeals Committee had erred in not finalising the matter within thirty (30) calendar days in terms of the Code. It was further stated on behalf of the Appellate that the charge of theft was not proved as the guest in question had not been called to testify. The appellant further submitted that the penalty of dismissal was too harsh in the circumstances. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Appeals Committee that was handed down on 17 July 2015. The Appeals Committee upheld the decision of Disciplinary Committee to dismiss the Appellant from employment. More
On 13th February 2014 at Harare, Arbitrator M. Dangarembizi issued an arbitration award. In terms thereof he dismissed Appellants’ claims against Respondent. Appellants then appealed to this Court. Respondent opposed the appeal.
The grounds of appeal were two-fold as follows,
“1. The Arbitrator erred by claiming that the Labour Act cannot override a clause in the Statutory Instrument which is inconsistent with it until it is repealed and registered with Section 82 of the Labour Act.
The S.I. of Agriculture 393 of 1993 provides that the Agreement or allowances shall not apply to contract employees. This clause contravenes the Labour... More
