This is an application for correction of an order in terms of section 92 C (1) (c ) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]. On 12 August 2015 this court granted the following order:
“1. The applicant having filed an application in terms of rule 19 (3)(a) of SI 59/2006, the application be and is hereby granted.
2. The respondent being barred for non-compliance with rule 19 (2) (ii) of S I 59/2006, the application under reference LC/H/APP/998/14 be and is hereby granted.” More
This is an appeal against the decision of Registrar of Labour allowing the registration of second respondent in terms of section 45 of the Labour Act, [Chapter 28:01]. Appellant is dissatisfied with the decision and has appealed to this Court. Appellant’s grounds of appeal are as follows:
1. The Registrar erred at law by disregarding the general rule enshrined in section 45 (i) (iv) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] on the desirability of reducing to the least possible member, the number of entities with which employees and employers have to negotiate.
2. The Registrar misdirected herself and erred at... More
The respondent in casu argued that he was on a contract with no limit of time and he had been unfairly dismissed with no notice given before the termination of his contract of employment. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award.
The respondent was employed by the appellant as its human resources manager from 1 July 2012. The contract was to run to the 30th of June 2015. On the 28th of April 2014, the appellant was however charged in terms of the National Employment Code of Conduct SI 15 of 2006, of gross incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of her work being a charge under Section 4 (f). More
This is an application for review of the decision that was made by the Respondent. On the 3rd of January 2014 the Applicant made an application to the Respondent for an exemption from compliance with a 6% wage increase. The Applicant sought to be exempted from compliance with the approved increase for twelve (12) months starting from July 2013 to June 2014 but the Respondent only allowed a one month exemption for June 2014. More
