Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an appeal and a cross appeal against the arbitrator’s award. The employee Cheneso had approached the arbitrator after her suspension by the employer Green Motors had been declared unlawful by a court of law. The arbitrator ruled that she was entitled to certain benefits which he awarded her but declined her some for reasons spelt out in the arbitral award. More

On 12th March 2012 the Honourable A.J. Manase made an arbitration award. In terms thereof he dismissed Appellant’s claim against Respondent for unpaid salary. Appellant then appealed to this Court. More

This is an application for quantification of damages. It is based on a judgment by CHIVIZHE J whose operative part reads as follows: “In the circumstances the appeal ought to be dismissed. The decision by the General Engineering Committee and indeed the decision by the Works Council clearly cannot stand. The Respondent shall be reinstated into employment with effect from the date of the wrongful termination of contract, being 24th March, 2009. The Appellant shall pay to the Appellant (sic) the salary and benefits from that date to the date of this order. ……………………………… In the event however that reinstatement... More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Respondent’s Disciplinary Authority, which found Appellant guilty of misconduct and imposed a penalty of demotion, transfer and reprimand. More

The 1st respondent is a former employee of the applicant. He was dismissed from the applicant’s employ following disciplinary proceedings. He was aggrieved by the dismissal. .He alleged that he had been unfairly dismissed and that the applicant had made some underpayments to him. The 1st respondent appealed against the dismissal to the ‘Exemption Committee’ and it ordered that he be reinstated without loss of salaries and benefits. The applicant on the other hand appealed to this Court against the decision to reinstate the 1st respondent. The appeal is still to be heard. Meanwhile the 1st respondent approached a designated... More