On 3rd September 2010 this Court made an order which directed Respondent to reinstate Appellant’s employ without loss of salary or benefits. In the event that reinstatement was untenable, Respondent was directed to pay Applicant damages for loss of employment. On 21st November 2012 Applicant filed this application for quantification of damages. Respondent opposed the application. More
This judgment deals with issues arising out of an application for review LCH946/24 and appeal LCH945/24. These matters were filed with the Labour Court by the applicant employee following his dismissal from employment by the National Prosecution Authority (NPA) where he was employed. For expediency both the review and the appeal were heard on the same day. The decision to entertain both matters at the same time arose from the realisation that a decision on the review would render the decision of the appeal moot. More
This judgment deals with issues arising out of an application for review LCH946/24 and appeal LCH945/24. These matters were filed with the Labour Court by the applicant employee following his dismissal from employment by the National Prosecution Authority (NPA) where he was employed. For expediency both the review and the appeal were heard on the same day. The decision to entertain both matters at the same time arose from the realisation that a decision on the review would render the decision of the appeal moot.
Facts giving rise to the 2 matters are that theemployeeAdmire who was in the employment... More
On 12 June 2014 at Harare, arbitrator R Matsikidze issued an arbitration award. He dismissed appellants’ claims against respondent. Appellants then appealed to this court against the award. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an application for condonation of late filing of application for review. A dispute arose between the Applicants and the Respondent which was referred for conciliation. The parties could not agree and the matter was referred to arbitration. Applicants were employed on fixed term contracts which were not renewed when they expired. Applicants alleged that they were on contracts without limit of time and the termination of whose contracts on notice was irregular. The arbitrator ruled in favour of the Respondent, dismissing the claim for lack of merit. The award was rendered on 18 September 2013. More
