This appeal proceeded in terms of Rule 22 of this Court’s Rules Statutory Instrument 59 of 2006 after the Court found that Respondent had not shown good cause why he did not file his response to the appeal as required in Rule 15.
This is an appeal against an arbitral award issued against Appellant wherein it was ordered to reinstate Respondent with effect from 7th December, 2013 or pay him damages if reinstatement was no longer possible. More
This is an appeal from an arbitral award. The arbitrator ordered that the respondent be reinstated without loss of salary and benefits or payment of damages in the alternative. More
The respondent was employed by the appellant. Allegations of misconduct were raised against him, he was charged and found guilty and dismissed.
After his dismissal, a dispute arose as to the terminal benefits he was entitled to. The matter was referred for arbitration and the arbitrator found that gratuity was payable as part of his terminal benefits. This aggrieved the appellant who then brought these current appeal proceedings. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The application is at the instance of the applicant Municipality in a matter where respondent employees successfully sought reinstatement relief from a labour officer in a labour dispute pitting them and the Municipality. After deliberations were made on the Labour dispute the labour officer ruled that the employees had lost their jobs irregularly. In the result he reinstated them without loss of salary and benefits. In the alternate he ordered the Municipality to pay the employees damages in lieu of reinstatement. More
