This Court issued judgment referenced LCH 148/24 on 03 April 2024.Whereas it has come to the Court’s attention that the judgment contained a patent error in its body in the penultimate paragraph on page 4. More
At the onset of oral argument respondent raised a point in limine. Appellant opposed the same. The point is succinctly set out in respondent’s heads of argument thus,
“1. It is respectfully submitted that the appeal is not properly before this honourable court as there is no right of appeal against a draft ruling of a labour officer made in terms of section 16 of the Labour Amendment Act, 2015.” More
This is an appeal against a decision of an arbitrator. The issues for determination by the Arbitrator were:
i) Whether there was unfair dismissal
ii) Whether there was non-payment of allowance (s) overtime and terminal benefits
iii) The remedy of thereof
After considering the evidence presented, the Learned Arbitrator found that there
was no unfair dismissal but that there was non payment of allowances. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent’s Disciplinary Committee, which found the appellant guilty of misconduct and imposed a penalty of dismissal. More
The history of this matter is that on 12 June 2015 Mrs Justice KUDYA struck off the roll on application for condonation of the late noting of an appeal by the applicants under Case No LC/H/APP/1008/14. The application for condonation was struck off because the applicants had filed the application for condonation of the late noting of appeal whilst there was pending application to amend that appeal. This application to amend the appeal has since been withdrawn as shown by Annexture “C”. The applicants have now brought this application for reinstatement of application for condonation for late noting of appeal. More
