This is an application to compel transfer consequent upon an agreement of sale of “proposed subdivision B of Lot 369 Highlands Estate of Welmoed measuring approximately 2033 square metres” entered into between the applicant and the first respondent in January 2015. More
This is an application for bail pending appeal. After I had heard argument from both parties I indicated that my ruling would be given on 21 August 2012. This is it.
The applicant was convicted of attempted rape by the Magistrates’ Court at Kadoma. He was sentenced to four years imprisonment of which one year imprisonment was suspended for five years on condition that within that period the applicant does not commit any offence involving sexual violence and for which upon conviction he will be sentenced to imprisonment without the option of a fine. The applicant noted an appeal against... More
Respondent’s (employer) Executive Chairman wrote a letter dated 30th March 2020 to Appellant (employee). The contents show that the employee was demoted after disciplinary proceedings. The employee then appealed to this court against both the verdict and penalty. More
This is a court application with the title “court application to compel.” In the main, applicant is seeking the following relief: that 1st respondent (council) be directed to comply with the directive of the 2nd respondent (Minister) issued in the Minute titled “Local Authorities Circular No 1 of 201” and transfer to the applicant stand 1563 Que Que Township, known as 31 Josiah Tongogara Avenue, Newtown Kwe kwe (property). In the alternative, that 1st respondent be directed to cause the property to be valued and thereafter to make a written offer to the applicant to purchase the said property at... More
In this case the appellant was convicted of theft of Trust Property as defined in
s 113(2)(d) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Cap 9:23], on 23 August 2011.
On the same day he was sentenced to 7 months imprisonment which was wholly
suspended on condition of restitution of the sum of US$3000 before a given date.
Dissatisfied with both his conviction and sentence, he noted an appeal against both
conviction and sentence. The appellant was a self-actor both at his trial and on appeal. More
On 4th February 2025 Applicant applied to this Court for condonation of non-compliance with the Court’s Rules. The application did not specify the Rule or law in terms of which it was made. At the onset of oral argument respondent raised 2 (two) points in limine which applicant opposed. The points shall be dealt with ad seriatim. More
On the 25th October 2017 at Chinhoyi, 2nd Respondent in his capacity as an Arbitrator issued an award. He ordered 1st Respondent (employer) to pay Applicant (employee) various amounts in respect of damages in lieu of reinstatement. The employee then filed an appeal and application for review with this court. The employer opposed the application and filed a counter-application for review, together with an appeal. All the matters were set down for hearing before us. At the onset of oral arguments, the parties agreed that the applications for review be dealt with first. More
The applicant is a former employee of the 1st respondent. He was dismissed from employment on 27th February 2008 following a disciplinary process. The applicant being aggrieved referred a complaint of unfair termination to the Labour Officer. The matter was later referred to compulsory arbitration. On 23rd March 2020 an award directing applicant’s reinstatement without any loss of benefits from the date of unlawful termination was granted. According to applicant from the date of that award to April 2011 the parties were engaged in negotiations for an exit package which never materialized. From April 2011 to 3rd February 2016 upon... More
This is an application by a designated agent, for the confirmation of the agent’s ruling. The agent ruled in favour of the employee in a dispute over termination of contract of employment. More
This is an application in terms of Section 93 (5a) and (5b) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] as amended for the confirmation of a draft ruling issued by the applicant in the matter between SHAKENATE CHARI and EMPIRE COLLEGE. The matter involved non-payment of terminal benefits and underpayment of wages, wherein Shakenate Chari (2nd respondent) was claiming of a total of $34 363,99 broken-down as follows:-
- underpayment of wages $484 x 5 yrs = $29 040.00
- leave days 40.33 x 5 years = 2 419.00
- gratuity 10% = 2 904,00
TOTAL = $34 363.99 More
Applicant applied to this Court for the review of disciplinary proceedings against her conducted by respondent. The application was made in terms of Section 89(1) d1 of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereby called the Act. Respondents opposed the application. More
respondents
DUBE-BANDA J:
[1] This is an application for, inter alia, declaratory orders and consequential relief in the following terms:
i. The meeting of the shareholders of the first respondent held on 31st July 2018 be and is hereby declared to be invalid, null and void for lack of quorum.
ii. Applicant’s removal from the position of director of the first respondent by way of XR 14 dated 2nd August 2018 and filed with the 4th respondent on 6th December 2018 be and is hereby declared to be null and void.
iii. The appointment of third respondent as director of... More
This is an appeal against a determination by the Respondent Managing director handed down on the 7th of March 2014 which determination altered an earlier decision by the Respondent Disciplinary Committee to impose a final written warning with an addition to pay Respondent for cost of hiring a recovery vehicle. The Managing Director altered the penalty to a heavier penalty of termination with immediate effect.
The background facts to the matter are as follows;
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Cross Border Driver in August 2010. On the 18th of December 2013 he allegedly went off route... More
The applicant is a Nigerian immigrant who is in Zimbabwe. He was arrested on 6 February 2012 by Immigration officers. On 14 February 2012 he filed this urgent chamber application in which he seeks the following relief by way of Provisional Order: More
On 23 March 2022, at the instance of the first respondent who was challenging the decisions of the Master of the High Court to confirm interim liquidation and distribution accounts in respect of the Estate of the Late Edward Nyanyiwa, the High Court (“the court a quo”) issued the following order: More
