This is an application by a designated agent. It is an application for the confirmation of the designated agent’s ruling. It is in terms of section 93 (5a) (a) and (b) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 (the Act). The application is by default, not opposed by the first respondent who is the employer. More
This is an application for the review of the Master’s decision of 3 September 2004 in which he approved the award of house number 1242 Unit A Chitungwiza (the immovable property) by Joshua Songore to Josiah Gweme. Josiah Gweme (the first respondent) counterclaimed for the eviction of the applicant from the immovable property. More
1. The applicant brought an application in terms of s 236(4) (b) of the High Court Rules, 1971, (the Rules). She seeks an order for dismissal of the respondent’s case on the premise that he failed to pursue an application he filed by neglecting to set it for hearing entitling her to apply for dismissal for want of prosecution.
2. Rule 236(4) stipulates as follows;
“(4) Where the applicant has filed an answering affidavit in response to the respondent’s opposing affidavit but has not, within a month thereafter, set the matter down for hearing, the respondent, on notice to the... More
This is an appeal against the decision of the N. E. Appeals Committee which upheld the Appellant’s dismissal by the Respondent on gross misconduct charges of failing to obey a lawful instruction in contravention of the National Employment Code of Conduct for Welfare and Educational Institutions. More
The applicant is Edson Dylka E Neurice Limitada a peregrine company domiciled and incorporated in Mozambique. It is in the business of transporting goods within and across neighbouring countries including Zimbabwe. The respondent is Zimbabwe Revenue Authority statutory corporate body established under the Revenue Authority Act, [Chapter 23:11]. The respondent inter-alia is responsible for revenue collection on behalf of Government and is also the regulatory authority for the exportation and importation of goods at the country’s borders. The respondent also administers and enforces the Customs and Exercise Act, [Chapter 23:02] (“the Act”). More
This is an appeal purportedly brought in terms of section 361 of the Mines and Minerals Act, [Chapter 21:05] ("the act") against the refusal of the 1st respondent (the Mining Commissioner) to grant the appellant a certificate of registration under an ordinary prospecting licence. More
: It is an ambitious claim. On 9 April 2010 the plaintiff issued summons in this Court seeking delivery of ten tobacco bulk curers and a payment of US$191 250-00 being damages caused by the alleged failure to deliver the tobacco curers by the defendant. More
The appeal was noted against the arbitral award handed down on 10thMay 2013.The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Senior Promotions Officer in the Sales Marketing Department. His contract of employment was terminated following a retrenchment exercise which resulted in the Retrenchment Committee issuing a retrenchment certificate on the 20th of December, 2012. The Appellant subsequently referred a complaint of alleged unlawful retrenchment and non-payment of contractual entitlements to conciliation. Upon failure to conciliate the matter was referred to an independent arbitrator. More
The appeal was noted as against the decision by the Appeals Committee which confirmed Appellant’s dismissal from employment with effect from 2 September, 2011 on charges of “extortion-proved dishonesty.”
The facts surrounding the misconduct charges were that the Appellant who was employed as invoicing clerk, on the 4th of July 2010 used one Tendai Janha’s profile to generate on the computer an invoice for a non-trading company that is Madziwa Trading. The transaction turned out to be fraudulent as the Respondent lost goods through the delivery of goods to a person other than the purported customer shown on the invoice.... More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Leave is being sought by the employee in a labour dispute between him and the employer. More
The appellant and the fourth and fifth respondents are aspiring parliamentary candidates. The appellant’s nomination papers were rejected while those of the fourth and fifth respondents were accepted by the first respondent. The second respondent is the Electoral Commission responsible for conducting elections in Zimbabwe. The third respondent is the Minister responsible for the administration of the Electoral Act (Chapter 2:13) and the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission Act (Chapter 2:12), herein after called the Electoral Act and the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission Act. More
The appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty, of contravening s 157 (1) (a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (unlawful possession or use of dangerous drugs). He was found in possession of 4.660 kg of dagga. He was sentenced to 36 months imprisonment of which 12 months imprisonment was suspended on conditions of good behaviour.
He has noted an appeal against sentence. The grounds of appeal are stated as follows:
“1. The Magistrate misdirected herself when she did not give specific and detailed reasons why community service was not imposed as the optional... More
The applicant seeks the following relief before this honourable court.
TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
a. The respondent and any persons acting on his behalf or for his interests are hereby prohibited from denying the applicant access to his mining claim located at sub-division 6, Ndiri South Mazoe within RA PJ 002 measuring 23 hectares in any manner whatsoever.
b. Respondent is ordered to pay cost of suit. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 13 January 2021 under judgment No. HH 25-21. The court a quo dismissed the appellants’ claims in HC 7760/18 and HC 7843/18, which had been consolidated, upon finding that the appellants had no locus standi in judicio to seek the cancellation of two agreements of sale viz; one between Village Inn (Pvt) Ltd and Tatipano Properties (Pvt ) Ltd and the other between Folay Investments (Pvt)Ltd and Paradise Road (Pvt) Ltd. More
This is a chamber application for leave to appeal, condonation for late filing of the application for leave to appeal, and exemption from security for the respondents’ costs. More
