This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Magistrate Court sitting at Chitungwiza on 7 June 2023wherein the court awarded the custody of the parties minor child, a son, to the appellant’s estranged husband. The child in issue is called Colt Anopaishe Chaza born on 30 October 2013. He is currently in boarding school in Macheke and is in 5th grade. More
The respondent’s counsel applied for upliftment of the automatic bar and for condonation for late filing of Heads of Argument on behalf of the second respondent. She said the second respondent was initially represented by another law firm which renounced agency on 7 November, 2013. The second respondent himself deposed to an affidavit to the effect that he had encountered difficulties with his previous lawyers who were not working on the case while at the same time unwilling to give him his file until 7 November, 2013when they eventually did so. The applicant opposed the application but in the interests... More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interim order interdicting the first respondent from publishing a voters’ roll with the photograph of the applicant. The final relief sought is for s 9(c) of the Electoral (Voter Registration) Regulations, 2017, which are contained in Statutory Instrument 85 of 2017 to be declared ultra vires s 57 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. The application is opposed by the third to thirteenth respondents. The first and second respondents elected to abide by the decision of this court. The first defendant filed an affidavit solely for the purpose of placing certain pertinent information... More
Appellant appealed to this Court against an arbitration award made in favour of Respondent. The grounds of complained that,
“1. The Arbitrator erred and misdirected himself in law by concluding that the Respondent exercised reasonable skill, due diligence and care in the execution of his duties.
2. the Arbitrator erred and misdirected himself in law in interpreting the Respondent’s letter of promotion of 1st December2000, in particular, by concluding that the Respondent cannot be held to have exhibited gross incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of his duties when his contract of employment did not oblige him to check in... More
The appellant was, before his dismissal, the provincial Labour Administrator for Masvingo Province.
On 4 November 2014 appellant was arrested by CID on allegations of receiving a bribe as a result of a trap executed at the instance of Great Zimbabwe University. On 5 November he was sentenced upon conviction to 3 years imprisonment. More
On 5th March 2025 at Marondera Designated Agent T. Chamisa issued a determination
which ordered respondent to pay applicant US$1, 525.00 as terminal benefits but dismissed the claim of under-payment. Applicant then filed the present application for the review of the determination in terms of Section 89(1) d1 of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondent opposed the application.
At the onset of oral argument the both parties raised points in limine. The points shall be addressed in turn. More
This is an application for an order compelling the 3rd respondent to commence the preparation of the documentation necessary for the conveyance of a property being Stand No. 4772, Bulawayo Township, commonly known as No. 15 Worcester Crescent, Hillcrest, Bulawayo, [the property] into the applicant’s name, and an order compelling the 1st and 2nd Respondent to accept payment of the purchase price being RTG$ 50 000.00. In essence, this is an application for an order compelling specific performance. More
This application arises from the judgment of my sister MAKARAU JP (as she then was) delivered on 21 November 2007 under case number HC 6844/06 (Judgment HH 81/2007). The applicants sought and were granted an order that certain immovable property, namely, stand 658, of Quinington Township of Subdivision 6 of Quinington of Borrowdale be transferred to themselves pursuant to a contract of sale entered into between them and the respondent. More
At the hearing of this matter, the respondent was automatically barred from appearing before the court as he had not filed his heads of argument within the time prescribed in the rules. A formal court application was filed on 4 September, 2007 seeking the up-liftment of the bar. The application was opposed. More
Plaintiff issued summons in which she sought a decree of divorce, custody and maintenance in respect of their minor child, a division of matrimonial assets and an order that defendant be ordered to purchase 63 120 First Mutual shares or alternatively pay their equivalent value and costs of suit. More
Plaintiff issued summons against the defendant seeking an order that defendant pays to her the sum of $7 000 000, 00 being damages for pain, shock suffering and contumelia suffered by her as a result of an unlawful assault perpetrated upon her person but certain members of the Zimbabwe National Army during the course and scope of their employment with the defendant on 4th June 2003 at 293/23rd Crescent, Glen View 1, Harare. Plaintiff holds defendant vicariously liable for the delict committed by members of his troop. More
At the base of a multi-layered series of interloculocutory applications lies the quest by applicant to set aside a confirmed judicial salein execution. The subject of that sale is her former matrimonial home, a property in which she claims (and seeks to rescue) a 50% undivided share. The property was attached and sold in 2015, and eventually transferred to first respondent in 2019. In that regard, applicant approached this court seeking leave to file out of time, an objection to the confirmation of that sale by second respondent. That application was opposed by first respondent who later moved the court... More
[1]This is an opposed application for a declaratur in which the applicant seeks the following relief:
“IT IS HEREBY DECLARED THAT:
1.The Applicant is the rightful owner of Stand 2178 Westlea, Mutare.
2.The lease agreement entered into between the 3rd Respondent and the 1st Respondent is null and void.
CONSEQUENTLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
3.The 1st and 2nd Respondents are hereby interdicted from constructing on Stand 2178 Westlea, Mutare.
4.The 3rd Respondent shall cancel the lease agreement executed in favour of the 1st Respondent over Stand 2178 Westlea, Mutare.
5.The 1st and 2nd Respondents shall demolish any structure it... More
Introduction. This is an application for bail which is necessitated by the termination of bail by the operation of law after an accused has pleaded to the charge. An accused person may be re-admitted to bail, on similar or other conditions that the court may in its discretion consider. It is my view that admission to bail pending trial and to bail once trial has commenced, are inquiries what are based on different considerations, because the circumstances will have changed. The basis on which bail is opposed pre-trial are not necessarily the same as that on which it is opposed... More
