Halwick Investments (Pvt) Ltd the employer is seeking leave to appeal against the order which struck off its matter from the roll. Samson Geti the employee is opposed to the grant of the leave relief. Sadly Mr Geti has not complied with the rules of court by not filing heads of argument. He is thus barred in the matter. He however seeks from the bar that the bar operating against him be uplifted. He cites administration glitches as the excuse for his non compliance. More
This is an application for leave to appeal against the decision of the labour court where it ruled that the employer’s notice of opposition was bad at law on account of the fact that there was no formal board resolution authorising the deponent to the opposing affidavit to depose to facts on behalf of the employer and that the legal practitioners for the employer had not filed an assumption of agency. More
This is an application in which applicant is seeking an order to compel first respondent to transfer to him an immovable property known as number 9 Clyde Road Famona Bulawayo. More
The applicant in this matter seeks an anticipatory interdict to preclude the termination of the salary and benefits due to him in his capacity as an employee of the respondent trade union.
The applicant was elected to the post of senior vice-president at the trade union’s congress held in the year 2000. By virtue of Article 8 of the respondent’s constitution, the applicant simultaneously became a full-time employee of the respondent.
At the last congress of the respondent, which was held in August 2005, the applicant was not re-elected to the post of vice-president. He then instituted an application in... More
The applicant seeks a declaratur. The relief sought is set out in the draft order as follows:
“IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. That the application for Declaratur be and is hereby granted.
2. That the garnishee order issued on 8 May 2019 against the Applicant for payment in United States dollars is invalid and is hereby set aside.
3. It is specifically declared that:
3.1 the debt of US$ 29 115.12 in terms of order dated 25th October 2017 by Honourable Justice Charewa is deemed to be valued in RTGS dollars at a rate of one-to-one to the United States... More
MUNANGATI - MANONGWA J: The parties herein have requested for reasons for judgment and these are they: The applicant approached this court seeking the following relief;
1. That the respondent and all persons claiming occupation through her shall vacate stand number 282 Chadcombe Township of stand 221B Chadcombe Township,
2. Harare, measuring 4109 square metres, otherwise known as Stand 282 Kaye Eddie Dr, Chadcombe, Harare, within seven days from the date of this order failing which the Sheriff for Zimbabwe shall evict them from the property and give the applicant vacant possession thereof.
3. That Applicant pays costs of suit... More
I heard this matter on 14 September, 2020. I delivered an ex tempore judgment in which I granted the applicant’s prayer.
On 2 October, 2020 the first and second respondents wrote to the High Court registrar. They requested reasons for my decision. They indicated that they wanted to appeal my decision. The reasons are these:
The applicant purchased from one Cyprian Musarurwa (“Musarurwa”), who is now late, a certain piece of land which is situated in the district of Salisbury called stand 282 Chadcombe Township of Stand 221B Chadcombe Township (“the property”). It is 4109 square metres in extent and... More
The applicant approached this court seeking a declarator in terms of s 14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]. More particularly, the applicant prayed for the relief couched in the following manner:
“(a) The 1st Respondent did not afford a proper opportunity to the Applicant to exercise its right of first refusal in respect of the property being Stand 3188 Salisbury of Salisbury Township Lands registered under Deed of Transfer Number 7820/1989 also known as Number 1 Elsworth Avenue, Harare. More
The applicant is the owner of a certain property known as No 38 Wansford Townhouses being an undivided share of Stand 15125 Salisbury Township (“the property”) which it holds by Deed of Transfer No 2893/2002. It was previously owned by the Mining Industry Pension Fund (“MIPF”). More
On 20 September 2024, I struck the present application from the urgent roll. I am now supplying the reasons for the order of 20 September 2024 upon applicant’s request. More
The applicant is a housing consortium with a membership of eleven cooperative societies.
The applicant occupies the remainder of GlenEagles farm (Budiriro 5) Harare.
Its application for regularisation of occupation is currently before the respondent for determination.
The allegation is made that thirty members of the applicant are in occupation and about 200 families had erected temporary structures on the land in question.
On 9 August 2018 the respondent delivered a notice to the applicant in terms of clause 18(2) of the Urban Council’s (Model) USe and Occupation of Land and Buildings) By-Laws 1979 Statutory Instrument 109 of 1979. More
This matter was placed before me as an application for review. It was filed pursuant to Rule 14 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. The application is opposed. The Respondent party was directed by the Court on the date of hearing, and duly filed its Notice of Response and Heads of Argument on the 15 June, 2022. The parties thereafter requested the court to hand down its judgment based on their written submissions. More
This is an appeal against conviction only. The appellant was conviction only. The appellant was convicted of culpable homicide as defined in S 49 of the Code. The culpable homicide charge emanated from a road traffic accident that took place at the intersection of Lobengula Road and the Harare - Mutare highway. More
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as the Chief Assayer. Part of his duties included keeping safe and secure samples received in the assay laboratory from various mines. It was also not in dispute that a spare key to the safe had been missing for in excess of seventeen years and had never been found. On the 10th of May, 2012 the Appellant in the company of two others, opened the safe and discovered that nine gold bullion samples were missing. The Appellant had been asked to release the gold bullion samples in question. The Appellant had no idea... More
