This is an urgent application for an interdict to prevent the respondents from interfering with the applicant’s occupation and use of the immovable property at 76 Kaguvi Street, Harare. More
This matter follows upon the issue of a consolidation order by this Court. As a result, the appeals by appellant and 2nd respondent against the arbitral award issued by 1st respondent were heard as one matter. The following is the judgment in the both matters. More
This matter follows upon the issue of a consolidation order by this Court. As a result, the appeals by appellant and 2nd respondent against the arbitral award issued by 1st respondent were heard as one matter. The following is the judgment in the both matters More
On the 12th September 2021 at Harare, Designated Agent P. Chiyangwa issued a determination. She ordered appellant (employer) to pay respondent (employee) an amount of US$10,416-00 in respect of terminal benefits. The employer then appealed to this Court in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 (hereafter called the Act). The employee opposed the appeal. More
The first applicant and respondent are embroiled in litigation regarding the construction of roads in Kensington Township 6. As a result of the discord between the first applicant and respondent, the respondent issued a public notice, the import of which was the non-issuance of rates clearance certificates in respect of the Kensington Township 6 property. As a result of this suspension the first applicant is unable to pass transfer to the second and third applicants. This has exposed the first applicant to threats of litigation for failure to pass transfer and also first applicant’s reputation is being questioned due to... More
This is an appeal against the decision by first respondent to cancel Appellant’s Mining Certificate and to suspend its mining activities as well as the second respondent’s recommendation to cancel the same certificate. More
This is an urgent chamber application for stay of execution, declaratory order and consequential relief made in terms of r 60 of the High Court Rules 2021 as read with s 14 of the High Court Act. More
Applicants 1 to 6 are politicians. So are respondents 1 and 2. Applicant no 7 is a political party. So also is respondent no 3. Applicant no 7 and respondent no 3 use the same name, People’s Democratic Party (“PDP”). The one is a breakaway faction of the other. Respondent no 4 is the Speaker of Parliament (“the Speaker”). Parliament is respondent no 5. Respondent no 6 is the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (“ZEC”). It has not participated in these proceedings. More
The applicant imported a motor vehicle through the Beitbridge Border Post in December 2014 under the Customs and Excise (Suspensions) Regulations which suspended duty on motor vehicles imported by physically handicapped persons (also known as the disability rebate). The applicant, as an individual had met the requirements of the disability rebate in terms of the above Regulations. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator where he ruled that the appellant employees be paid overtime which was due to them and that the rate to be used for payment of their field duty danger allowance be $5-00 per day a figure to which it was reduced by the works council meeting of 10 July 2009 down from the previous $15-00 per day.
The employer opposed the appeal on the basis that the arbitrator was right to hold the employees to the works council document because same was negotiated on their behalf and they could thus... More
This is an application for leave to execute pending determination, by the Supreme Court, of the appeal against this court’s judgment under HH 339-18. More
The applicant is a police officer. He was charged with acting in a manner likely to bring discredit to the Police Force in contravention of para 35 of the Schedule to the Police Act [Cap 11:10]. A perusal of the record of proceedings shows that he was caught red handed in a police trap after demanding and receiving a bribe. He was searched and found in possession of the bait money. More
This is an application for condonation of late filing of an application for review.
The applicant was employed by the Ministry of Health as a pharmacy technician based at Mpilo Central Hospital. On 30 November 2012, he applied for manpower development leave in terms of section 40 (3) of the Health Service Regulations, Statutory Instrument 117 of 2006. He had been accepted at the University of Limpopo to study for a Pharmacy degree from 28 January 2013 to 27 January 2017.
In support of his application for the manpower development leave, the applicant pledged to be bonded for four years... More
This matter is an application for review.
The applicant appeared before a Magistrate sitting at Mbare Magistrates Court facing a charge of fraud as defined in section 136 (a) (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23].
He was charged with Wayne Victor Moss who was the first accused while the applicant was the second accused. More
