This is an application for review as well as an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator.
The grounds for review are;
1. That the honourable arbitrator grossly erred at law in proceeding to determine the matter without the parties having gone through conciliation proceedings in terms of the law.
2. The arbitrator grossly erred in proceeding to determine the matter without giving an opportunity to the parties to make oral submissions in support of the written submissions. More
The appellant in this case is employed by the respondent. The background facts of this dispute are that the appellant was given a laptop to use in the course of his duties. More
: This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the Magistrates Court which dismissed Claim A of the appellant against the respondent but awarded claim B as claimed. The parties had entered into an oral agreement in terms of which the appellant would transport defendant’s container from Kariba to the Democratic Republic of Congo in exchange for payment in United States Dollars into the appellant’s nostro account More
On 14 February 2020 the plaintiff sued out of this court summons against the defendant seeking an order for specific performance or alternatively the payment of damages for breach of contract in the sum of $4 560 000. In terms of the former, the plaintiff averred that the defendant had reneged on his undertaking under an agreement to avail his farm (Lot 16 of lot 10A, Chicago, Kwekwe) to the plaintiff to subside and develop into residential stands. According to the plaintiff it was a term of the agreement that upon the completion of the project the plaintiff would share... More
The applicant is the registered owner of a property known as stand number 35 Vainona Township of Vainona Harare. The said property was purchased from one Tonderai Tarima who, at some point, tried to litigate to reverse the sale and transfer of the property to the applicant. More
This is an application for stay of execution of an award by an arbitrator.
To enable an application of this sort to succeed, the applicant must show that they have good prospects of success in the main appeal, that there is
likelihood of suffering irreparable harm on the part of the applicant and that the balance of convenience favours the granting of the application. More
This is an appeal against the ruling of a labour officer, who is the 1st respondent, dated 29 June 2023 and duly registered with the High Court. The matter was heard before me on 31 January 2024. More
Before hearing this matter I heard an application filed by the respondents under case number HC 8966/16 for condonation for delay in filing opposing papers in this matter. The applicant herein did not oppose such application on condition the respondents pay costs for such application. Mr Mukucha left the issue of costs in the court’s hands. It is my view that it is appropriate that the respondents pay such costs. More
The first applicant is a publishing house in the print media industry. Its flagship is the weekly newspaper, the Zimbabwe Independent. The second applicant is a non-profit trust. It is the local chapter of an international organisation. Its mandate is described as broadly to fight and expose corruption, and to demand transparency in governments, state-owned firms and private institutions. Respondents 1, 2 and 4 are ministers of governments in charge of local government, finance and transport respectively. Respondents 1, 2 and 4 are ministers of governments in charge of local government, finance and transport respectively. The third respondent [ZUPCO] is... More
This is an opposed application for a postponement. The application was granted in open court and reasons were given ex tempore in the presence of the parties and their legal practitioners. This was on 20 May 2013. More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an application for leave to appeal against my judgment of 17 August 2012. Such application was filed on 25 April 2013, some 8months late. Applicant explains their delay as follows;
“That they were negotiating an out of court settlement with the Respondent. Failure to reach an out of court settlement has now prompted the Applicants to make this application.” More
This matter was set down as a n appeal at the instance of the appellant employer against the decision of the appellant’s internal National Hearing Committee (herein after referred to as NHC). More
This is an application for the dismissal of an application for quantification of damages which was correctly made in terms of Rule 19(3)(a) of the Rules of this Court. More
