The six appellants were charged with contravening s 368 (1)(a) as read with s 4 of the Mines and Minerals Act 1 of 2006, that is to say, unlawful prospecting or searching for any Minerals, Oil or Natural gas without a valid prospecting licence. More
The matter was heard in Mutare in May 2010. The parties by consent agreed to file Supplementary Heads of Argument. The court would thereafter hand down judgment on the basis of the written submissions. After the date of hearing the record got misplaced in the registry. It was only referred back to me in July 2013 for hand down of judgment. Any inconvenience to the parties is sincerely regretted.
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Security Sergeant and had been employed in that capacity for 10 years. He was suspended from employment on 22 October 2003 on... More
The matter was heard in Mutare in May 2010. The parties by consent agreed to file Supplementary Heads of Argument. The court would thereafter hand down judgment on the basis of the written submissions. After the date of hearing the record got misplaced in the registry. It was only referred back to me in July 2013 for hand down of judgment. Any inconvenience to the parties is sincerely regretted.
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Security Sergeant and had been employed in that capacity for 10 years. He was suspended from employment on 22 October 2003 on... More
At the trial of this matter, the defendants were in default. They were duly served with the notice of the trial on 1 October at their chosen address for service. The plaintiff moved for default judgment to be entered against the defendants as prayed for in the summons. Entertaining doubts as to whether or not the plaintiff’s claim was sound, I requested the plaintiff to address me on whether or not the original contract between the parties was not in contravention of the Exchange Control Regulations and thus unlawful. The plaintiff, who appeared before me in person, opted to file... More
In or about January 2006, the applicant and the first respondent entered into an agreement of sale in respect of certain immovable property called Stand number 584 Greystone Park Township of Greystone. In terms of the written agreement, the purchase price for the property was the sum of $400 000 000-00 and this was to be paid in full within 5 days of the signing of the agreement. The payments clause in the agreement of sale provided that the purchase price was payable in full upon the signing of the agreement but a special condition of the agreement provided that... More
On 13 March 1984 the plaintiff and the late Jackson Jekera entered into an agreement of sale of an immovable property namely, Stand no. 13451- Unit ‘N’ Seke. The agreement was reduced to writing. In terms of the agreement of sale the late Jackson Jekera sold his rights in the said property to plaintiff for the sum of $1100 Zimbabwean dollars. The plaintiff paid a deposit of $800 and the balance was to be paid by May 1984. More
On 23 June 2008 the plaintiff issued summons out of this court against the defendant. After the plaintiff furnished it with the further particulars it requested, the defendant, inter alia, excepted to the summons and declaration on 3 October 2008. The basis of the exception was that the defendant had ceased to exist both at the time the cause of action arose and at the institution of proceedings. More
