The applicant seeks a provisional order in the following terms:-
“TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
That you should show cause to this Honourable Court why a final Order should not be made on the following terms:-
1. That it is hereby declared that the first and second respondents, and all those acting through them, restore all the gym equipment unlawfully removed from the gym at Shop 15, Borrowdale Brook Shopping Centre.
2. Further, it is hereby declared that the first and second respondents and all those acting through them, be and are hereby permanently interdicted from disturbing and or... More
The plaintiff and the first defendant were wife and husband respectively under an unregistered customary law union which has now been dissolved. The second defendant, Kuyeri Family Trust (hereinafter The Trust) is cited in these proceedings on account of the purported interest it has in the major dispute between the plaintiff and the first defendant. More
The plaintiff instituted proceedings against the defendant on 18 March 2011 seeking contractual damages arising from what she perceived to be an unlawful cancellation of an agreement of sale of a vacant stand entered into between the parties. More
On 24 August 2012 the applicant filed an urgent chamber application seeking a provisional order couched in the following:
“Interim Relief
Pending the return date –
1. The Zimbabwe 2012 edition of the Students In Free Enterprise competition is hereby suspended; and
2. The first respondent is hereby interdicted from performing any act calculated or likely to hinder the applicant’s participation in the 2012 SIFE World Cup scheduled for 23 September 2012.” More
This matter makes bad reading and its background can be summarised as follows:-
After the arbitrator had considered the submissions made by both the applicant and the first respondent, the Arbitrator determined the matter in favour of the first respondent and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent a total sum of $10 060-00 (ten thousand and sixty dollars) for having unfairly terminated the latter’s employment. This determination was made on 17 November 2011. More
It is not in dispute that the parties, at the request of the Plaintiff who felt uncomfortable with the interest related to the mortgage bond which was supposed to be secured through Beverley Building Society mutually agreed to vary the original agreement of sale on 4 September 2006 after they had agreed on new terms of payment. More
