The Appellant was employed by the Respondent. He was arraigned before a Disciplinary Committee on the 17th of May, 2011 to face two charges under the relevant Code of Conduct. He was charged under Section 9.2.4.ii of the Code of Conduct for having absented himself from work without reasonable excuse from 1 to 2 April, 2011 and from 9 to 26 April, 2011. On the second charge under Section 9.2.4.xvi the Appellant was alleged to have wilfully disobeyed a lawful order by a superior in that when asked to write a report on his absence he had refused to do... More
On 7 November 2012 the respondent (plaintiff in the main matter) issued summons against the excipients(second and third defendants in the main matter). The respondent’s claim was for:- More
This is an application for summary judgment in terms of r 64(1) of the High Court Rules,1971. Applicant sought to recover an amount of US$445 740.93 being monies due and owing in terms of overdraft and loan facilities extended to the respondents. More
This is an opposed interlocutory application for the upliftment of bar and condonation.
After reading the papers filed of record I was convinced that this interlocutory application could have been resolved between the parties through simple engagement without unnecessary detaining the court with such an application and the parties incurring unnecessary and probably avoidable costs. The first respondent however vigorously opposed the application. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Respondent Disciplinary Authority which dismissed the Appellant on the basis of charges of corruption which were leveled against her in 2011.
The facts of the case are that the Appellant who was in the employ of the Respondent as a clerk of court based at Chipinge Magistrates Court at the time of the allegations was brought before a Disciplinary Committee facing allegations of contravening the Public Service Regulations 2000 as amended as read with the Judicial Service Transitional Regulations 2010. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator where he declined to compel the parties to the instant case to introduce housing allowance in their 2012 negotiations at N.E.C. level. He however went on to advise the parties that in the then circumstances they had to leave the matter in the hands of the works council. More
The matter was placed before me as an appeal against a determination by the National Employment Council for the Motor Industry handed down on the 9th of October 2010 which found Appellant guilty of a misconduct and consequently imposed a dismissal penalty with effect from the date of suspension that is 7 September, 2009. More
