Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
The Respondent was employed by Appellant as a Store man. He was suspended on full pay on 24 May, 2011 pending investigations into allegations that he committed various acts of dishonesty. The allegations were that he acted as an accomplice to theft by assisting an employee of a neighboring company to store stolen goods in Appellant’s premises. He was arraigned for an internal disciplinary enquiry on 4 November, 2011. More

The matter was placed before me as an appeal against the determination by the Respondent’s Disciplinary Committee handed down on 16 August, 2010 More

: The accused is charged with murder as defined in s 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Cap 9:23]. He is alleged to have intentionally and unlawfully assaulted and killed his girlfriend on 19 June 2009 following a domestic dispute. More

This is an opposed application in which the applicants seek a rescission of judgement and an order in the following terms: More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Respondent’s Disciplinary Committee where it found the Appellant guilty of being absent from work for more than 5 days without reasonable excuse and subsequently dismissed him. The case has a long history of default judgments, rescission, striking off of the matter and at one point a withdrawal of the matter when there were efforts to have the matter settled out of court. The history being what it is, it is pertinent to note that it is only in the instant case that this case has been heard on the merits. It... More

The above is an application for leave to appeal against sentence by DanielChimunhu in person. The accused pleaded guilty for contravening s 157(c) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Cap 9:23]. He was found with a total of thirty dagga plants measuring an average of two metres in height without a permit. More

This is an application for condonation of the late noting of an appeal by the applicant against the respondent’s order where its Disciplinary Committee dismissed the applicant on allegations of breaching the respondent’s Code of Conduct. More