On 3rd September 2010 this Court ordered Respondent to reinstate Applicant or pay him damages in lieu of reinstatement. Respondent chose to pay damages. The parties were unable to agree on quantum of the damages. Applicant then filed this application for assessment of damages. Respondent filed opposing papers. The attorneys agreed that the matter be determined on the basis of the documents filed of record. More
The applicant, an incorporation registered in the United Arab Emirates, has made an approach to this court, on court application, seeking a provisional liquidation order against the respondent, another incorporation cherishing its domicile in Zimbabwe, on the basis that it is unable to pay its debts and that it is just and equitable that the respondent be wound up. The application is made in terms of s 207 of the Companies Act [Cap 24:03] (the Act). More
DOUGLAS MUZANENHAMO
v
(1) OFFICER IN CHARGE CID LAW AND ORDER
(2) OFFICER COMMANDING HARARE CENTRAL DISTRICT
(3) COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE
(4) CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS
(5) OFFICER IN CHARGE HARARE CENTRAL PRISON
(6) COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF PRISONS
(7) MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND LEGAL AFFAIRS
(8) ATTORNEY - GENERAL
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF ZIMBABWE
CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, ZIYAMBI JA,
GARWE JA, GOWORA JA, PATEL JA, HLATSHWAYO JA,
CHIWESHE AJA & GUVAVA AJA
HARARE, MAY 24 & NOVEMBER 14, 2013
Z.T. Chadambuka & D. Chimbwe & M.T. Zhuwarara, for the applicant
T. Dodo & C. Chimombe, for the respondent
PATEL... More
This is an application for the condonation of the late filing of Heads of Argument by the Respondent in the main appeal hereinafter referred to as the (“employee”) in an appeal by the Appellant in the appeal and the Respondent in the instant application (hereinafter) referred to as the (“employer”). More
In this matter the applicant is seeking a provisional order in the following terms:
“TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
Pending the determination of the application for rescission of judgment under Case No HC 10469/13, applicant is granted the following relief: More
The appellant is alleged to have stopped reporting for duty sometime in 2008. The employer then stopped paying the appellant’s salary because he was not reporting for duty. More
