The defendants (who are the excipients in this matter) have excepted to the plaintiff’s (who is respondent) declaration and I have, to decide whether that exception has merit or not. More
On the 7th October 2005 Arbitrator Chavura issued an award reinstating Applicant without loss of pay and benefits.
Respondent appealed to this Court and on the 31st May 2007 an order by consent was issued on the following terms-
- that Respondent reinstates Applicant pending early retirement with full benefits,
- that Applicant be on leave pending finalization of his packages/emoluments
- that there be no order as to costs. More
This matter is both an appeal and an application for review against a decision of the Premier Service Medical Aid Society (PSMAS) Appeals Committee handed down on the 18th of December 2012. More
This is an appeal against the decision of an arbitrator. The appellant was employed by the respondent as a manager at one of its branches. He was dismissed from the respondent’s employ following disciplinary proceedings for:
“any serious act conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of his or her conduct.” More
This is a rather unusual matter in which one of the issues to be resolved by this court relates to a maternity dispute. I must confess that I had for long labored under the mistaken belief that only paternity can reasonably be expected to be in dispute. More
On 25 March 2011 the plaintiff issued summons against the defendants in which he claimed:
“(a) Payment of the sum of USD14 850.00 due to the plaintiff, arising from damages which are a result of a collision between plaintiff and 1st defendant. Which collision was occasioned by 1st defendant’s negligent driving, whilst in the course of his work and scope of his authority with the 2nddefendant. The sum represents the damages plaintiff suffered.
(b) Interest thereon at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of issue of summons up to the date of full payment.
(c )Costs of... More
