This is an application in which the applicant seeks summary judgment in the sum of US$43 086-65 plus interest at the prescribed rate from due date to date of payment. It also seeks an order that stand 1346 Que Que Township of stand number 277A Que Que Township which was mortgaged be declared executable and that the respondent should bear the costs of suit on a legal practitioner and client scale. More
The applicants brought the above application under a certificate of urgency. In the interim they sought the release of certain goods, mostly vehicles, that had been attached in execution. It was also sought as an interim relief an order that the respondents should pay any storage costs that might have been incurred as a result of the attachment of the assets. For the final order it was sought that the actions of the respondents be declared illegal for allegedlycontravening s9A of the Finance Act [No2] of 2012 [sic] as read with the State Liabilities Act, [Cap 8:14]. One has to... More
There are two matters in respect of which the applicant instituted proceedings for provisional sentence against the defendant. In the first matter, Case No. HC 13730/12, the summons for provisional sentence was issued on 28 November 2012. The second summons, in Case No. HC 13977/12, was issued on 5 December 2012. More
The applicant is a company duly registered in the British Virgin Islands and whose principal place of business is in Al Khabaissi, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. More
The applicant was convicted by the provincial magistrate Gweru after a protracted trial on a charge of theft as defined in section 113 of the Criminal Law Codification Reform Act [Cap 9:23]. He was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment of which 3 months imprisonment were suspended on condition of good behaviour and a further 2 months were suspended on conditions of restitution. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was a school development chairperson and that he was disposed of school property that is bricks without following the laid down procedures. More
This matter was heard by President Makamure who sent the matter back to the employer to enable the employer to correct the inconsistencies between the findings of the Board and the letter of dismissal. Thereafter, the Appellant was to be heard in mitigation.
When the employer was saddled with the remitted matter, it realised it had to appoint some new persons to the Board. Some of the Board members had left the Organisation including the Chairman of the Board. More
This is an application for bail pending trial. The applicants are facing three counts of robbery, two counts of unlawful entry into premises and one count of theft as defined in sections 126, 131 and 113 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Cap 9:23] respectively. More
