On 10 June, 2013 the first respondent obtained judgment in the magistrates’ court against the applicants. The judgment which the court a quo granted to the first respondent in the sum of $51 051-98 was for arrear rentals, operational costs, interests and collection commission. More
On 13 December 2011 the plaintiff, a mining equipment supplier, issued summons out of this court seeking payment of the sum of US$325 119-65 being the invoiced cost of electrical goods that it sold and delivered to the defendant, a mining conglomerate, between 20 August 2009 and 12 December 2011, interest at the prescribed rate from 21 November 2011 and costs of suit.The claim was made up of goods worth US$ 78 485-61 delivered to Shamva Gold Mine, US$ 245 467-82 delivered to How Gold Mine, US$626-96 delivered to Redwing Gold Mine, and US$ 36 184-02 delivered to Mazowe Gold... More
The plaintiff is an avowed money lender whose business is to lend money to members of the public at an interest of 30% per month. She is not registered as such. She has sued the defendant for payment of a sum of $4 296-00 together with interest at the prescribed rate and costs of suit. More
This matter came to life as an urgent chamber application in terms of Order 40 Rule 348A sub-rule (5a) of the High Court Rules 1971( stopping of sale to facilitate settlement of claims) on 25 November 2011. The relief that was being sought by Granary Investments Private Limited (herein after referred to as Granary Investments) was: More
On 19th November 2012 the Honourable T.R. Viriri made an arbitration award. In terms thereof, he ordered Appellant to either reinstate Respondent’s employment or pay her damages in lieu of reinstatement. Appellant then appealed to this Court against the award. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an urgent chamber application in which the applicant is seeking in the interim an order that the respondents be interdicted from executing an order of this court given in Case No. HC 9602/11 pending determination of an application for the rescission of that judgment which was filed under Case No.HC 5490/13. The final order sought is for the setting aside of the order given in Case No. HC 9602/11. That is the same relief which is being sought in a separate application instituted by the applicant in HC 5490/13. More
