This is an application for condonation for late noting of appeal. The applicant was dismissed from employment on 18 September 2012. The applicant has not yet exhausted domestic remedies. He was supposed to appeal to the Chief Executive Officer. To date he has not made such appeal. There is therefore no determination of the Chief Executive Officer. In terms of respondent’s Code of Conduct an appeal from the decision of the Chief Executive Officer lies to this Court. More
Mr V. Mapepa for the Respondents applied that the matter be stood down to 1100 hours to enable the Legal Practitioner representing Respondents to avail herself at Court. Mr Mapepa submitted that such Legal Practitioner was attending a Pre – Trial conference at the High Court. No evidence was tendered in support of such submissions. Let me warn all legal practitioners to start respecting this court as a superior court. Most lawyers believe they can simply get a file from a fellow colleague and come before this court to inform this court to either postpone or stand down a matter. More
The respondent was employed by the applicant as a Finance Manager. By virtue of his employment the respondent was entitled to the following perquisites,
(a) Toyota Prado, registration No. ABH 7465
(b) A laptop and an iPad 2. More
The appellants were on their own pleas of guilty convicted of contravening s 184(g) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Cap 9:23]. They were each sentenced to 12 months imprisonment of which 2 months imprisonment was suspended on condition of future good conduct. More
This is an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The judgment in the main matter was handed down on 17 August 2012. The draft notice of appeal accompanied by the application for condonation for its late filing was filed with the court on 11 January, 2013. The application for condonation is opposed. More
Appellant was employed by Respondent as a Shift Supervisor. Appellant’s duties included issuing invoices to customers and in the absence of the cashier, also handle cash. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Appeal authority which confirmed the appellant’s dismissal from the respondent’s employment on the 10th of October 2012. More
