Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
The Applicant’s appeal before this Court was dismissed on 20th June 2013. The Applicant intended to appeal against the dismissal but was out of time. The Applicant then filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court coupled with an application for condonation. Since this was an improper procedure the Applicant then withdrew both applications. Thereafter Applicant filed this application for condonation for late filing of the application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. More

Appellant was employed by First Respondent as a disposal Supervisor. She was charged, found guilty and dismissed for breaching paragraph 9 and 13 (a) of the First Schedule of the Health Services Regulations 2006. The charges were of theft of, or making improper or unauthorized use of state property and corruption or dishonesty. The facts giving rising to the charges were that on 14 June 2013 during a routine search at ward A6 entrance at Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, appellant had been found in unauthorized possession of 10 ampoules of propofol, 1% Fresenius injection (20ml) and 10 sachets bacterex disinfectant... More

This is an appeal against the decision of the National Employment Council for the Printing and Newspaper Industry Appeals Committee. More

This an appeal against an arbitral award made in favour of the Respondent. More

This is an application for interim relief in terms of s 92 E (3) of the Labour Act. The Applicants are seeking to have the Court direct the Respondent employer to pay them the retrenchment package which was awarded in their favour by the Minister on 6 November 2012. More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award which awarded the respondent payment of US$451-00 as a balance of cash in lieu of leave. More

This is an application for review. The applicant was employed by the 2nd respondent in 2007. On 7 August 2013, the applicant was transferred to New Ambassador Hotel as an acting Front Office Manager. The appellant submitted that the substantive front office manager had then been suspended on allegations of various acts of misconduct. More