Appellant worked for Respondent as a Truck Driver. He was charged with misconduct. A hearing was held. On 19 December 2013 a disciplinary committee (DC) found him not guilty. The complainant appealed. On
14 January 2014 Respondent’s Managing Director (MD) allowed the appeal. He set aside the determination of the DC and proceeded to dismiss Appellant. The latter then appealed to this Court against his dismissal. The appeal raised both procedural and substantive issues. More
At the hearing of this matter Respondent raised a point in limine that Applicant had instituted parallel proceedings in the High Court under case number HC-5110/14. The said proceedings in the High Court were actually set down for 1600 hours on the same day. Respondent argued that Applicant was seeking before the High Court the same relief sought before this Court.
Mr. Mushoriwa denied that there were parallel proceedings in the High Court. He argued that the parties are different as the applicant before the High Court is Kadoma City Council. He also argued that the relief sought is different... More
Appellant has appealed to this court against the decision of the respondent employer’s Appeals Committee which upheld his dismissal in a case where he was found guilty of falsifying records, forgery and fraud in contravention of the Zimbabwe Parks Wildlife Management Authority Code of Conduct. More
Applicant was employed by 1st Respondent as its Accounts Clerk. Applicant was suspended in June 2006 over allegations of misappropriation of funds and incompetence. The matter only saw the light of day when a report was made to the Labour Officer culminating in arbitration where the Arbitrator found in favour of applicant. Respondent appealed to this Court and in her judgment dated 27 September 2013 Justice Hove ordered that the matter be referred to the employer to hold a hearing within specified periods of time. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award wherein Appellant is arguing that the Arbitrator erred when he made a decision that Appellant was fairly dismissed which decision was not backed by any reason or explanation. More
The appellant was employed by the respondent as a receptionist when, on the 6th November 2012 she was suspended, on allegations of negligence in the course of her duties for a missing blank receipt number 23143. This was done in terms of the NECCS employment Code of Conduct. Following a disciplinary hearing, appellant was found guilty and dismissed. More
The Respondent, an employee of the appellant was embroiled in a dispute with his employer. The Respondent was employed at the Appellant’s Treasury department. More
