At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court dismissed the appeal stating that the reasons would follow. These are they.
It is worth noting that Respondent was not in attendance as the Deputy Sheriff was unable to locate Respondent at the given address. The Respondent had not provided another address of service. The Court decided to proceed with the matter. More
The appeal was noted in terms of Section 51 of the Public Service Regulations, Statutory Instrument I of 2000against a determination of the Disciplinary Authority of Judicial Service Commission handed down on 27 October 2011 which determination found the Appellant guilty of ‘Any act or omission inconsistent with prejudicial to the discharge of official duties including abuse of authority” and imposed a dismissal penalty with effect from 18 August 2011. More
This is an application for quantification of damages. This quantification came after the appellant who was employed as a Bank teller was dismissed by the respondent for failing to comply with standing instructions. Appellant appealed to the National Employment Council for the Banking Appeals Board and the board upheld his appeal. The Board ordered that appellant should be reinstated without loss of salary and benefits. The appellant (Stanbic Bank) then appealed to this court against this decision on the 20th of June 2011. More
On the 3 July 2013 Applicant noted an appeal against the determination of the Respondent’s Appeals Officer confirming the penalty of discharge imposed by the Disciplinary Authority. More
This is an appeal by the appellant against his dismissal by the respondent. Before the appeal could be argued, the respondent raised three points in limine. These are that:
1. the matter was not properly before Court;
2. the appeal having been noted out of time, there was no application for condonation of such late filing of appeal out of time, and
3. no point of law was raised in the grounds of appeal
The first and most important issue is that the applicant was dismissed in terms of Statutory Instrument 130/2003 (S.I. 130/2003, “the regulations”) which was repealed and... More
This is an appeal against the decision of an arbitrator sitting at Harare. It is trite that an appeal on a point of law only lies to this court from a decision by an Arbitrator. This is provided for in section 98(10) of the Labour Act [Cap 28; 01] (The Act).
This matter was referred to arbitration for the Arbitrator to make a determination on the following issues.
(a) Whether or not the claimants were legally on forced leave
(b) Whether or not the Respondent committed an unfair labour practice by not paying the claimed statutory obligation including wage shortfalls?... More
