Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
Respondent was employed by the appellant as a barman. The allegations are that the respondent included a fake USD100.00 note in his daily takings which led to a disciplinary hearing. The disciplinary hearing recommended his dismissal. The matter was referred to conciliation and finally to arbitration. The Arbitrator found in favour of the respondent. More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award handed down by Honourable Kare where he ruled that the now appellant was not entitled to automatic renewal of his three year contract and that the now respondent pay to the appellant three months salary in lieu of notice and all calculable benefits among to the appellant. More

This is an application for condonation of late filing of heads of argument and upliftment of bar. Applicant filed an application for review on the 28 August 2013. On the same date, the First Respondent was called upon to file a Notice of Response in Form LC2. First Respondent, who was a self actor then, proceeded to file a Notice of Opposition on the 6th of September 2013. More

The record of this matter was placed before me in chambers for consideration. It is an application for interim relief purportedly made in terms of section 92 E subsection (3) of the Labour Act [Cap 28:01]. More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Appeals Authority of respondent which confirmed a guilty verdict and dismissal in respect of Appellant. More

On 24 March this Court gave an order for the consolidation of two matters “to be heard as one matter.” The two matters are under references LC/H/387/12 and LC/H/351/13. This judgment is on three points in limine raised at the hearing of these matters. Respondent was employed by applicant as a bursar on a five year fixed term contract. The contract expired on 30 November 2008. Respondent was offered further fixed term contracts of three months until 30 November 2008. On 30 November 2009 interviews or the bursar’s post were held. Respondent attended but was not successful. He thereafter made... More

Appellant having been aggrieved by an arbitral award noted an appeal to this court in terms of Section 98(10) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] the Act. More