The two accused persons are jointly charged with the offence of murder
as defined in s 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. More
The two accused persons were charged with murder as defined in s 47[1] of the Criminal Law [Codification and Reform] Act, [Cap 9: 23]. The allegations against them were that, whilst at a certain beer drink, they struck the deceased with clenched fists and a stone, intending to kill him, or, despite realising the real risk or possibility that their conduct might cause death, continued with it. The deceased later died on the way to clinic. More
On 12 October 2016, in HMA 04-16, we delivered judgment in Accused 2’s application for discharge at the close of the State’s case. We dismissed the application. The trial then proceeded for both accused persons to give evidence. This now is the final judgment. It is expedient to reproduce the material parts of the judgment aforesaid and take the matter up from there. More
The accused killed his elder brother over access to food on 12 July 2015. Upon being charged of murder as defined in s 47 (1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23] he admitted the charge of murder but as per procedure a plea of not guilty was recorded. More
This is an application in terms of Rule 22. The respondent failed to file its notice of response within the prescribed time. The brief History of the matter is outlined below:
On 12 October 2015 the matter was referred before me in terms of rule 22 of the Labour Court rules. The respondent had been served with an application for review and an appeal. The appeal and the application for review had been duly served on the respondent on 9 June 2015. Certificates of service were filed as of record to prove such service. More
