The respondent in casu argued that he was on a contract with no limit of time and he had been unfairly dismissed with no notice given before the termination of his contract of employment. More
This is an appeal against an arbitral award.
The respondent was employed by the appellant as its human resources manager from 1 July 2012. The contract was to run to the 30th of June 2015. On the 28th of April 2014, the appellant was however charged in terms of the National Employment Code of Conduct SI 15 of 2006, of gross incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of her work being a charge under Section 4 (f). More
This is an application for review as well as an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator.
The grounds for review are;
1. That the honourable arbitrator grossly erred at law in proceeding to determine the matter without the parties having gone through conciliation proceedings in terms of the law.
2. The arbitrator grossly erred in proceeding to determine the matter without giving an opportunity to the parties to make oral submissions in support of the written submissions. More
This matter was set down as a n appeal at the instance of the appellant employer against the decision of the appellant’s internal National Hearing Committee (herein after referred to as NHC). More
This is an appeal against the decision of Honourable Arbitrator Ms S Changawa dated 26 September 2014.
The brief background of this matter is that the seventeen respondents were employed by the applicant in different capacities and earning different salaries. The respondents referred the matter of unfair dismissal and outstanding salaries for arbitration. More
