The respondent was employed by the appellant as a Traffic Enforcement Supervisor until August 2015 when he was dismissed from employment following a disciplinary hearing.
The background to this case is not disputed. Following allegations of misconduct the respondent was charged and invited for a hearing on 13 December 2013. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator who ruled that the appellant employer was committing an unfair labour practice by making respondent employees act in grades higher than their real grades but not pay them an acting allowance or at least elevate them to the said higher grades. More
This is an application for leave to appeal against the decision of this court that was handed down on 18 December 2015. This court upheld the award by Honourable Arbitrator S Mugumisi dated 12 February 2012. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The brief facts are that applicant employs the respondents in various capacities. Respondents embarked on a collective job action and applicant sought a show cause order from the Minister which was granted. This court issued a disposal order on 17 March 2016. Applicant intends to approach the Supreme Court on appeal, hence this application. More
This is an application for rescission of judgment. The application emanates from a judgment of this court granted in default on 20 May 2015, as a result of the applicant’s failure to file heads of argument. More
The appellant in this case was charged in terms of section 44 (2) (a) of the Public Service Regulations 2000 as read with paragraphs 8, 9 and 24 of the First Schedule to the Regulations.
When the allegations were preffered against him, the applicant admitted during the hearing that he had failed to bank school funds. He stated that he had erred in failing to bank the school moneys. More
This is an appeal against a determination by the Respondent Managing director handed down on the 7th of March 2014 which determination altered an earlier decision by the Respondent Disciplinary Committee to impose a final written warning with an addition to pay Respondent for cost of hiring a recovery vehicle. The Managing Director altered the penalty to a heavier penalty of termination with immediate effect.
The background facts to the matter are as follows;
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Cross Border Driver in August 2010. On the 18th of December 2013 he allegedly went off route... More
