Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
This is an application for rescission of a default judgment, upliftment of bar and condonation for late filing of heads of argument, filed on 17 August 2015. The background to this matter is common cause. The applicant was employed by the respondent as a Purchasing Clerk. He was dismissed from employment in March 2015 following disciplinary proceedings in which he was found guilty of misconduct, in terms of the respondent’s Code of Conduct. The charges involved were “Sub-standard performance of work and Theft/Fraud/Dishonesty”. On 14 April 2014 the applicant filed an application for review with this court.He sought to set... More

This is an application for condonation of late noting of rescission of judgment application at the instance of the applicant employer. Facts giving rise to the matter are that the respondent employee made his review application to the Labour Court in a case pitting him and the applicant employer. The employer failed to file its response to the review timeously and the matter was subsequently set down for hearing in terms of rule 22 Labour Court rules. More

This is an application for condonation for failure to file a Notice of Response to the respondent’s appeal in case number LC/H/505/15. More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award in terms of which the appellant was found guilty of misconduct and dismissed from employment. More

The appellant was employed by the respondent as a Graphic Designer(Layout Artist). More

The court proceeded to deal with this appeal on the record, in terms of section 89 (2)(a)(i) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] (“the Act”). More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Appeals Committee to uphold the decision of the Disciplinary Committee dismissing appellant from employment. Appellant, who was employed by the respondent was charged and convicted of various acts of misconduct. She was subsequently dismissed from employment. She appealed against the dismissal but was not successful before the Appeals Committee. She then appealed to this court. More