On 29 June 2015 arbitrator P Chirongoma issued an arbitration award. In terms thereof he ordered appellant to pay respondent a sum of $1 514.00 in respect of notice pay, cash in lieu of leave and underpayment of wages. Appellant then appealed to this court against the award. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent’s Disciplinary Authority which dismissed the appellant from employment following allegations of misappropriating the respondent’ dipping fees. More
This is an appeal against the determination of the respondent’s Disciplinary Authority, which found the appellant guilty of misconduct and dismissed him from employment. More
The facts in this appeal are common cause. Respondents are employed by the appellant in various capacities. The dispute between the parties arises from the provisions of transport allowances for the respondents. More
This appeal raises one issue, whether an application for exemption made in terms of Statutory Instrument 102 of 2014, The Collective Bargaining Agreement: Welfare and Educational Institutions, suspends the obligation to pay the promulgated salaries and benefits
The background to this case is not in dispute. Statutory Instrument 57 of 2013 Collective Bargaining Agreement: Welfare and Educational Institutions was promulgated gazetting the applicable minimum wages for the period 1 May to 31 August 2009. The appellant had not effected any increments for respondents together with the other employees. It was not in dispute that the employees were entitled to backpays... More
Applicant applied for the review and reversal of 2nd respondent’s determination date-stamped 20 March 2015. Respondent/s opposed the application. The determination is filed of record. In the main it endorsed the “exemption agreement” between the employer (Peterhouse) and 129 employees wherein the parties agreed to waive stipulated wages. More
At the hearing of this matter I upheld the appeal and indicated that reasons would follow. These are they.
This is an appeal against the determination of Appeals Committee of the National Employment Council for the Welfare and Educational Institutions in Zimbabwe (NECWEI). Respondent was employed by the appellant as a grounds man. He was charged with wilful disobedience to a lawful order given by a person in authority and deliberately giving untrue, erroneous or misleading information or testimony whether verbally or in writing. He was found guilty and was dismissed from employment. Aggrieved with the dismissal, he appealed to... More
