Electronic Court judgements

Browse Court Judgements by year

At the hearing of this matter I dismissed the application with costs and indicated that reasons would follow. More

This court dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the decision of NEC for Engineering Industry. The applicant is dissatisfied with the decision and seeks to approach the Supreme Court. This is therefore an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in terms of section 92 F of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]. The facts in this matter are largely common cause. The respondent and applicant were embroiled in a labour dispute which culminated in it being referred to conciliation. The result was that the parties agreed to resolve this dispute and the respondent was reinstated. The respondent was made... More

This matter, an application for condonation of late noting of an application for review was brought for my consideration in chambers. There was no response filed by 5 July 2016 when I considered the application. I dismissed the application. The applicant has requested reasons for my ruling. These are they. I found that the delay in noting the application was inordinate. The applicant was discharged from service on 8 October 2007. He became aware of the discharge in October 2007 but only filed the current application on 18 May 2016. The nine year delay is inordinate. More

This is the return day of an application for confirmation of a ruling made by the applicant, a labour officer. More

Applicant was employed by the respondent in its ICT Division. Following allegations of misconduct, applicant appeared before a disciplinary committee which found him guilty of one court but not guilty on the other charge. The disciplinary committee recommended his dismissal. The matter ended up in arbitration before Honourable Dangwa. The arbitrator found that applicant had not been unfairly dismissed. Applicant has approached this Court on review. More

This is an appeal against an arbitral award handed down on 15 May 2015, wherein the arbitrator dismissed the appellant’s claim on the basis that the matter was not properly before her. More

By reason of an allegation by the applicant of a breach of his fundamental right enshrined in s 56(1) of the Constitution, this application gained direct access to the Constitutional Court (“the Court”) through the front door, which is s 85 (1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013 (“the Constitution”). More