On 30 January 2017 the applicants instituted the instant chamber application seeking the following relief which is set out in the draft provisional order:
“FINAL RELIEF SOUGHT
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
WHEREUPON after reading documents filed of record:
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents and any person acting for and on their behalf be and are hereby interdicted and restrained from infringing on the applicant’s trademarks No. 1710/2000 in Class 34 by using the name ‘Rudland & George’ and/or... More
This is an urgent chamber application for a mandamus which is being brought in terms of s 4 (2) (a) and (c) of the Administrative Justice Act [Chapter 10:28] and s 68 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013. More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interdict barring the first and second respondents and any persons acting through them from interfering with the applicant as he retrieve his assets which are currently sitting on the third respondent’s premises in Msasa Harare. More
This is an application for review in terms of Order 33 Rule 256 of the High Court Rules 1971 against the decision of the first respondent dated 8th December 2015. The background to the application is that the applicant was charged for contravening s 3 (25) of the Prisons (Staff) (discipline) Regulations 1984, More
The brief facts are that the first respondent obtained a default judgment on 6 September 2017 after the applicant was duly barred for failing to file its plea despite that the Notice to Plead and intention to bar had been received by the clerk of the applicant who accepted service on behalf on of the applicant . More
On 26 March 2011 the Applicant filed an application in this Court seeking the following order:
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Agreement of Sale that was entered into between the City of Masvingo and
Treasure Consultants (Private) Limited, for the sale of 500 stands in the Runyararo South West Residential area Masvingo, on 20 December 2005, (“the Agreement”) be and is hereby declared a validity existing agreement.
2. The purported existing cancellation of the Agreement by the First Respondent is void and therefore a legal nullity for want of compliance with the Law.” More
The applicant seeks the following relief-
“TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
That you show cause to the Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms-
1. The interim relief be and is hereby confirmed.
2. The execution of a garnishee of accounts during contestation of tax liability be and is hereby declared unlawful.
3. Section 69 of the Income Tax Act [Chapter 23:06] be and is hereby declared unconstitutional and struck down.
4. That the respondent shall pay the costs of this suit on a higher scale of legal practitioner and client only if... More
