The plaintiff issued summons against defendant for the payment of $47 714.24, interest at the rate of 28% per annum capitalised monthly from 1 June 2013 together with costs on a legal practitioner and client scale. The claim was based on a working capital loan and input facility scheme which the parties entered into on 18 October 2009. More
The appellant and the respondent were in a banker-customer contractual relationship. The respondent operated a current account and a fixed deposit account with the appellant Bank. More
The plaintiff is a corporation registered in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The defendant is also a corporation registered in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The defendant accepted appointment as a reinsurance agent of the plaintiff whose duties included delivering communications from the plaintiff to its reinsurers. More
In this matter the applicant applies for default judgment. The chamber application does not specify the rule which is being relied upon for seeking default judgment. More
It being the court’s considered view that this appeal was without merit, vexatious and abuse of court process we dismissed the appeal with costs on an attorney-client scale on 23 February 2017. More
On 30 January 2017, the applicant filed this urgent chamber application seeking the following interim relief:
“1. That the first and second respondents be and are hereby directed to repay to the applicant any and all monies taken by them pursuant to the issue by the first respondent of the notice in terms of s 58 of the Income Tax Act [Chapter 23:06] from the accounts as detailed hereunder More
