Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
The plaintiff brought a claim for $181 273.00 against the defendant, its former farm manager. The defendant has in response, filed a claim in reconvention amounting to $123 259.75. The parties will for ease of reference, be referred to as plaintiff and defendant. More

Parties herein are husband and wife. The plaintiff seeks divorce and ancillary relief against her husband the defendant whom she married in accordance with customary law rites in 2004 and wed in terms of the Marriage Act More

This is an application for a declaratory order in the following terms: “ 1. Applicant be and is hereby declared the rightful lessee of Plot Number 227 measuring 10,288 hactares(sic) situate at Rainham Farm. 2. The subdivision of Plot Number 227 situate at Rainham Farm into various smaller units or the downsizing of Plot Number 227 situate at Rainham Farm from 10,288 hactares(sic) to 3 hactares(sic) by the Respondent be and is hereby declared unlawful. 3. Applicant and/or its agents, assignees, representatives be and are hereby declared to have unhindered access to a certain piece of land situate at Rainham... More

This is an application for a declaratory order. The applicant seeks an order that it be declared the registered holder of mining rights known as Miralto 32, that the first respondent be ordered to vacate Miralto 32 forthwith plus costs of suit. More

The discovery of diamonds at Chiadzwa in Marange District brought fortunes to some families based in the eastern parts of Zimbabwe. The parties herein being a good example. Theirs is a “rags to riches” story where they moved from occupying a single rented room to ultimately buying a house in a plush suburb in Mutare as well as owning thirteen (13) motor vehicles among them top of the range. More

The applicant, a company incorporated according to the laws of Zimbabwe, contracted the second respondent to execute debt collection services from various debtors on its behalf. The second respondent is also a company which was registered in terms of the country’s laws. The first respondent is a director of the second respondent. More

In this matter the plaintiff a company duly incorporated and registered in terms of the laws of the Republic of South Africa sued the first, second and third defendants jointly and severally the one paying the others tobe absolved for (a) payment of the sum of ZAR 716 250.00 (b) interest at the prescribed rate from 1 April 2013 to the date of full and final payment and (c) costs of suit on a higher scale. More