Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
This is an application for reinstatement of the appellant’s appeal deemed dismissed in terms of r 44 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules 1964 for failure to file heads of argument on time. More

This matter was brought to me in terms of s 9(6) of the Guardianship of Minors Act [Cap 5:08] by the Magistrate sitting as the children’s Court at Masvingo. More

The plaintiff issued summons against the defendants claiming jointly and severally the one paying the other to absolved payment of US$501092.34 being capital, US$54 695,59 being interest, US$180.00 being Bank charges, interest on the sum of US$501 092.34 at the rate of 23% per annum subject to variation from time to time with effect from the 16th of August 2016 to date of payment and costs of suit on a legal practitioner and client scale and collection commission as provided for under the Law Society of Zimbabwe by –laws (1982). More

The applicant applied for bail pending appeal by application filed on 31 May, 2017. More

This is an application for stay of proceedings that are before the second respondent pending the determination of an application for review of the second respondent’s dismissal of an exception to the charges. More

At the commencement of the hearing, Mr Uriri for the applicant applied to amend the applicant’s draft order with the consent of Mr Manjengwa for the respondent. The prayer in the draft order was accordingly deleted and substituted as follows: 1. It is hereby declared that procurement contract No. ZPC 304/2015 dated 23 October, 2015 between the applicant and the respondent is valid and binding between the parties. 2. Consequent on the declaration of validity of the contract, a decree of specific performance be and is hereby issued. 3. The conditions precedent the satisfaction period are deemed to have ben... More

This is an application for the setting aside of the judgment given in default of the applicants in Case No. HC 11164/17. The judgment was given on 15 May 2018. The application is opposed by the first, second and fourth respondents. In addition to contesting the application on the merits the respondents took certain objections in limine which the court would need to consider first. However, a consideration of the grounds of objection requires that the background facts be outlined first as they are relevant to the determination of the objections in limine. The following are the material facts which... More