On 3 October 2013 the plaintiff was a fee paying passenger aboard a Toyota Hiace, commuter omnibus, registration number ABQ 3761, belonging to the defendant and being driven by Tawanda Madzimbamuto. The commuter omnibus, [hereinafter referred to as the kombi] was involved in a road traffic accident at the National Sports Stadium in Harare resulting in three people losing their lives. The driver of the kombi died on the spot. The plaintiff sustained injuries as a result of the accident. More
The applicant was on 16 March, 2016 convicted on his plea of guilty by the magistrate at Chinhoyi for the offence of stock theft as defined in s 114 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. More
At the conclusion of submissions in this application, I immediately pronounced that I was striking this matter off the roll because it was wholly unprocedural. I reserved my ruling on the first respondent’s application for costs de bonis propriis against the law firm representing the applicant, namely C Nhemwa & Associates. I indicated the detailed reasons for striking the matter off the roll would appear in my written judgment. More
I heard this application on 11 June, 2018. I delivered an ex-tempore judgment in favour of the applicant.
On 19 September, 2018 the registrar of this court wrote advising that the first respondent appealed my decision. He requested for my reasons for the same. More
The applicant is seeking a declaratory order in terms of s 14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]. The application was prompted by a dispute arising from an amendment to the Dadaya Mission Trust Deed and the appointment of the second to fifth respondents as trustees.
From the onset, Mr Chidyausiku took the preliminary point that the first respondent is barred on account of filing heads of argument beyond the prescribed period. He moved that judgment be granted on an unopposed basis. The first respondent’s heads of argument were filed on 28 August 2018 despite having been served with... More
In this application, the applicant attached in execution certain movable goods listed in annexure B to the application. The goods were attached for execution to satisfy a judgment of this court in the case Tian Ze Tobacco Company (Pvt) Ltd vLawrence Katsiru Case No. HC 2100/14. The two parties are the judgment creditor and debtor respectively. In terms thereof the judgment creditor caused the issue of a writ of execution to recover an amount in excess of $224 003-16 and execution costs. More
