This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Labour Court handed down on 21 June 2019 in which it partially confirmed a draft ruling of a Labour Officer. The Labour Court remitted the matter to the Labour Officer for a determination of the issue of reinstatement, alternatively damages in lieu thereof and their quantification. More
This is an application for leave to appeal against a decision of this court handed down on 26 July 2019.
The application is in terms of section 92F of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] (the Act) which requires that an application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Labour Court on a question of law shall lie to the Supreme court and a party seeking to
appeal from any decision of the Labour Court shall seek, from a Judge who made the decision, leave to appeal the decision. More
This is an application for leave to appeal a decision of this court to the Supreme Court. The decision being sought to be appealed against was handed down on 26 July 2019.
When the application for leave to appeal was heard in court, the 2nd respondent raised 3 points in limine. The 2nd respondent argued that the application was fatally defective due to its failure to comply with the law and practice and must be struck off the Roll. More
In this appeal the respondent raised a point in limine to the effect that ground of appeal No 1 was not a ground of appeal but one of review. The grounds read-
1. The Hearing Authority erred procedurally in inviting the parties to file closing submissions immediately after the closure of the Complainant’s case without putting the Appellant to his defence and allowing him to be cross- examined.
2. The Hearing Authority erred at law in retaining a verdict of guilty in the absence of evidence on a balance of probabilities to that effect seeing as:
2.1 There were clear... More
The first appellant, Firinne Trust, is a trust incorporated as such by deed of Trust under the laws of Zimbabwe and registered with the Registrar of Deeds. It trades as Veritas, which is the second appellant herein. The first respondent, is the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, (ZEC), established in terms of s 238 of the Constitution. Although it is established under the Constitution it carries out its mandate in terms of the Electoral Act [Chapter 2:13], the (“Act”). The second respondent, the (“Minister”) is the government official assigned the administration of the Act. The third respondent, (“the Attorney-General”), is the legal... More
1. On 31 August 2018, the Administrative Court handed down a judgment against the appellant. The judgment dismissed with costs, the appellant’s appeal to that court. The appellant had appealed against a decision of the first respondent declaring her to be unsuitable to be associated with a company or partnership which practices as an estate agent, barring the appellant from any such association or being employed by any such company or partnership and lastly, ordering her to reimburse the sum of US$120 000.00 to one Nancy Yu Ling Long. More
