This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the High Court, upholding the respondent’s claim of a 50 per cent share of an immoveable property registered in the appellant’s name pursuant to the distribution of property upon divorce. More
On 23 November 2016, in an action based on two alleged oral contracts, the High Court found in favour of the respondent and ordered the appellant to pay to the respondent with costs, the sums of CAD$89 810, US$17 477.00 and CAD$ 1 400 .00. This is an appeal against that order. More
This is an application for condonation for non-compliance with the Rules of this court and for an extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of review in terms of the same Rules. The application is not opposed by the 1st Respondent but is opposed by the 2nd Respondent. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 26 October 2016 dismissing the appellant’s application for specific performance with costs. More
This is a bail application pending trial. Applicant is jointly
charged with one Nyarai Magaya and Frederick Topia with one count of theft as defined in
section 113 of the Criminal Law [Codification and Reform] Act Chapter 9:23, and one count
of Money Laundering as defined in section 81 (1) of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of
Crime Act [Chapter 9:24]. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court sitting at Bulawayo. The judgment upheld the respondent’s court application for the registration of an arbitral award against the appellant in terms of the Arbitration Act [Chapter7:15] (UNCITRAL) Model Law Schedule (Section 2) (Model Law). More
This is an application for contempt of court. The applicant seeks an order couched in the following terms:
1. The respondent be and is hereby declared to be in contempt of court of High Court cases HC 3183/17 and HC 2031/18 and accordingly respondent is ordered a sum of $10 000.00 for contempt.
2. The respondent be ordered to immediately comply with court orders HC 3183/17 and HC 2031/18 and stop interfering with the applicant’s use, occupation and possession of the Mapari / Devuli Ranch.
3. The respondent is to pay costs of suit.
The application is opposed. More
