The applicant filed what it termed:
“Urgent Chamber Application for stay of execution and ancillary relief”. The relief sought is couched in the following terms:
“Terms of final order soughtThat you show cause why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
1. It be and is hereby declared that the proceedings under case number HC 1594/15 are a nullity on account of the citing of a non-existent plaintiff.
2. The attachment and removal of the applicant’s property pursuant to the court order of the Honourable Mr Justice MATHONSI of the 19th of October 2017 be and... More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court sitting at Harare in which the court dismissed an application for the amendment of summons and plaintiff’s declaration in case number HC 9631/16. More
Applicant filed this chamber application seeking that the application under cover of case number HC 2034/18; X-Ref. HC 166/18; X-Ref. HC 2005/17; X-Ref. HC 1355/16 be dismissed for want of prosecution, with costs on a legal practitioner and client scale and de bonis propriis. This application was filed with this court on the 16 August 2019. On the 30 August 2019, respondents filed a notice of opposition, and opposing affidavits deposed to by the first and second respondents. More
1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the Labour Court handed down on 20 March 2015 dismissing with costs, an appeal by the appellant against an arbitral award in favour of the respondent. More
The appellant appeals against the whole judgment of the Labour Court sitting at Harare, being judgement LC/H/74/17 handed down on 10 February 2017. More
This is an appeal against a judgment of the High Court dated 27 July 2016, in which the court dismissed an application by the appellant seeking to set aside a sale in execution conducted by the second respondent in the execution of a writ of execution for the payment of a debt due to the first respondent. More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the Labour Court dated 16 October 2016 in which the court a quo upheld the appellant’s conviction on a charge of improper association with his minor pupil by having sexual intercourse with her and giving her family planning tablets. Following his conviction on the above charge the appellant was dismissed from employment. Leave to appeal was granted by this Court on 24 March 2016 and condonation for late noting of appeal and extension of time within which to note the appeal was granted on 31 August 2017. More
