This is an appeal from the decision of the National Hearing Committee which committee overturned the conviction and penalty of the Disciplinary Committee.
The appellant charged the respondent of an act of misconduct in terms of the company code of conduct. The respondent was charged of committing category 4.1 offence in that he had repeated a category 3.1 offence when he was still serving a penalty for the category 3.1 offence. Category 4.1 offence is Gross Misconduct. The charge arose from failure to communicate to a client on the complaints raised by the client and failure to attend to the... More
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the High Court Harare, handed down on 8 August 2018. The part appealed against dismissed the appellant’s application for:
a) an order declaring the Postal and Telecommunications (Licence Registration and Certification) (Amendment) Regulations, 2013 (No. 6) (“S.I 122/ 2013”), to be: -
(i) ultra vires the Postal Telecommunications Act [Chapter 12:05] “the Act”, and therefore,
(iii) null and void; and,
b) an order compelling the first respondent to comply with ‘its statutory obligations’ in relation to the enforcement of s 37(5) of the Act regarding publication of licenses by the... More
This is an application for condonation and extension of time within which to note a review application in terms of r 13 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 More
This is a court application filed in terms of r 449 of the High Court Rules, 1971 in which the applicant seeks an order rescinding the order granted by this court on 27 November 2019. In terms of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 the High Court Rules apply whenever there is a lacuna in the Rules of this Court. The application is opposed by the respondent. More
This is an appeal against the decision off the respondent employer’s disciplinary committee which found the appellant employeeguilty of conduct inconsistent with the conditions of her contract in contravention of section 4 (a) of the Model Code. Events leading to the appellant’s dismissal were that during a management and board meeting she shouted obscenities and banged the table thus putting the meeting into disrepute. More
This is an application for the placement of the first respondent under Provisional Judicial Management in terms of section 207 as read with section 206 (g) of the Companies Act (Chapter 24:03). More
